Saturday, March 23, 2019

Sell USDINR; target of 68.55 - 68.45: ICICI Direct

ICICI Direct's currency report on USDINR

Spot Currency

The rupee sustained sharp gains to end higher at 68.53 against the US$, rising for a sixth consecutive day. Weakness in the US$ along with a sharp rise in domestic equities is supporting the rupee • The dollar was mildly lower against major currencies ahead of US FOMC policy meeting. Market expectations are the Fed would continue to hold a dovish stance while any change from the same could result in sharp gains in the dollar. Investors await details on Brexit update as time is running out for the UK. The British Pound is expected to gyrate wildly as with only 10 days for the actual Brexit date the UK Parliament members continue to remain divided.

Benchmark yield

Sovereign treasury yields declined mildly to 7.32% as muted global yields and lower inflation kept yields in a range. Domestic retail inflation for February rose to 2.57%. Crude oil price strength could weigh on domestic debt • US treasury yields rose to 2.60% while worsening global growth expectations could cap rising yields. Incoming economic data remains important for further signals.

Currency futures on NSE

The dollar-rupee March contract on the NSE was at 68.63 in the previous session. March contract open interest declined 4.91% in the previous session • We expect the US$INR to meet supply pressure at higher levels. Utilise upsides in the pair to initiate short positions.

Intra-day strategy 

US$INR March futures contract (NSE) View: Bearish on US$INR
Sell US$ in the range of 68.74 -68.80 Market Lot: US$1000
Target: 68.55 / 68.45 Stop Loss: 68.93
Support Resistance
S1/ S2: 68.55 / 68.40 R1/R2:68.75 /68.90
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on moneycontrol.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions. Read More First Published on Mar 19, 2019 11:05 am

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019

tags:LQSIF,BF-A,LILA,PSCD,DIOD,OMN,CODI,TLF,SEB,BDX,

Progressive Corp (NYSE:PGR) reported earnings-per-share of 35 cents for August 2018, rebounding from the year-ago loss of 2 cents. The figure was driven by an improved top line. Year-to-date, PGR stock has rallied 22.1%, outperforming the industry’s 9.5% increase.

This rise in Progressive stock was courtesy of the company’s consistent strong results.

PGR Stock and the Numbers in August

Progressive recorded net premiums written of $2.6 billion in the month, up 17% from $2.2 billion in the year-earlier period. Net premiums earned were about $2.5 billion, up 21% from $2 billion recorded last August.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Liquor Stores N.A. Ltd. (LQSIF)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By ]

    British Columbia and Alberta have chosen a different strategy where retail sales will be allowed through both public and private stores, similar to its current setup for liquor retail in the provinces. Retailers will have to get their supply of cannabis from the government's wholesale distribution system, similar to how it works for alcohol now. The government will control online cannabis sales exclusively Our take: British Columbia also announced that physical retailing of cannabis and liquor will have to be separate, meaning stores cannot sell both products. This rule has an impact on existing liquor retailers aiming to convert some of their stores to sell cannabis. Aurora invested in Liquor Stores (renamed to Alcanna (OTCPK:LQSIF)) which has been struggling for years in the liquor business. Other pharmacy chains will also participate in the RFP as we have seen in Loblaw's recent win in Newfoundland and Labrador. We think for many cannabis companies the path to winning those retail licenses will be a challenging one with the competition from multiple sources. The licenses will be hotly contested given that B.C. is the largest market to allow private retailing, leaving us cautious on those companies betting big on winning those contracts. The likely outcome is that a large number of companies will each win fewer contracts.

  • [By ]

    It also holds just under 20 percent share of Liquor Stores N.A. (OTCPK:LQSIF) and over 17 percent of Radient Technologies Inc. (OTC:RDDTF). Aurora has other holdings as well.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-A)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Rich Duprey, John Bromels, and Anders Bylund]

    Coupled with a solid business that points to their being able to raise their payout every year for years to come, Cintas (NASDAQ:CTAS), A.O. Smith (NYSE:AOS), and Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF-A)(NYSE:BF-B) are three Dividend Aristocrats that you can buy once for your portfolio and hold on to forever.

  • [By Dan Caplinger]

    The stock market did exceptionally well on Wednesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbing more than 300 points and certain other major benchmarks reaching record heights. In general, investors remained upbeat about the prospects for the U.S. economy overcoming any trade-related tensions and continuing to grow, riding the wave of lower corporate tax rates to boost profits. Yet even with a favorable mood in the market overall, some companies had bad news that sent their shares sharply lower. Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA), YY (NASDAQ:YY), and Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF-A) (NYSE:BF-B) were among the worst performers on the day. Here's why they did so poorly.

  • [By Chris Hill]

    In this episode of MarketFoolery, host Chris Hill talks with Motley Fool analyst Emily Flippen about the market's biggest news. Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE:ANF) is up huge on a deeply lame quarter. Was there some gold hidden between the lines, or was this yet another case of bad results beating terrible expectations? Dollar Tree (NASDAQ:DLTR) saw a little pop after its earnings report, but more interestingly, the company announced some big changes regarding its Family Dollar acquisition. Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF-A) (NYSE:BF-B) fell about 7% after reporting earnings. Could it be that they just have too many brands? Chinese automaker NIO (NYSE:NIO) tanked, but investors probably want to resist the "China is too scary" narrative that's cropping up as a result. Tune in to find out more.

  • [By Rich Duprey]

    Tariffs have long weighed on shares of whiskey distiller Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF-A) (NYSE:BF-B), which exports more than half of its spirits to international markets, led by its best-selling Jack Daniel's whiskey. In its most recently-reported quarter, net sales were flat at $910 million due to tariff-related inventory reductions. That followed a big sales increase in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, when customers were racing to stock up ahead of the imposition of retaliatory tariffs by Europe.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Liberty Global plc(LILA)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Motley Fool Transcribers]

    Liberty Latin America  (NASDAQ:LILA)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 21, 2019, 9:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Brian Zook -- Chief Accounting Officer

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    SG Americas Securities LLC bought a new stake in shares of Liberty Latin America (NASDAQ:LILA) during the 1st quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The firm bought 16,429 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $320,000.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Liberty Latin America (NASDAQ:LILA) has been assigned a consensus rating of “Hold” from the ten ratings firms that are covering the stock, Marketbeat.com reports. Three analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, six have assigned a hold rating and one has given a buy rating to the company. The average 12 month price objective among brokerages that have issued a report on the stock in the last year is $24.75.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Dish Network (NASDAQ: DISH) and Liberty Latin America (NASDAQ:LILA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Liberty Latin America Ltd Class A (NASDAQ:LILA) SVP Christopher J. Noyes acquired 20,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, August 22nd. The shares were bought at an average price of $17.93 per share, for a total transaction of $358,600.00. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is accessible through this hyperlink.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Teacher Retirement System of Texas cut its holdings in shares of Liberty Latin America (NASDAQ:LILA) by 39.2% during the 1st quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The firm owned 10,187 shares of the company’s stock after selling 6,571 shares during the quarter. Teacher Retirement System of Texas’ holdings in Liberty Latin America were worth $198,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: PowerShares S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio(PSCD)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Wells Fargo & Company MN raised its holdings in shares of Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (NASDAQ:PSCD) by 0.9% during the second quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The firm owned 815,500 shares of the company’s stock after buying an additional 6,884 shares during the period. Wells Fargo & Company MN owned 0.47% of Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF worth $53,700,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Diodes Incorporated(DIOD)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Diodes (DIOD)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ:DIOD) VP Francis Tang sold 6,560 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, August 27th. The shares were sold at an average price of $38.90, for a total transaction of $255,184.00. Following the sale, the vice president now owns 88,597 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $3,446,423.30. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is accessible through this link.

  • [By Money Morning Staff Reports]

    That's a great way to cash in on the growth of technology without buying into overhyped (and overpriced) semiconductor stocks, like Diodes Inc. (Nasdaq: DIOD), which trades for 111 times earnings.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. lessened its stake in shares of Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ:DIOD) by 67.0% during the first quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm owned 23,610 shares of the semiconductor company’s stock after selling 47,902 shares during the period. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s holdings in Diodes were worth $719,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Bank of Montreal Can decreased its stake in shares of Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ:DIOD) by 34.8% in the 2nd quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The institutional investor owned 85,993 shares of the semiconductor company’s stock after selling 45,817 shares during the quarter. Bank of Montreal Can’s holdings in Diodes were worth $2,965,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: OMNOVA Solutions Inc.(OMN)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    OMNOVA Solutions Inc. (NYSE:OMN) – Analysts at KeyCorp issued their Q2 2019 earnings estimates for shares of OMNOVA Solutions in a report issued on Wednesday, February 6th. KeyCorp analyst M. Sison expects that the specialty chemicals company will post earnings per share of $0.17 for the quarter. KeyCorp also issued estimates for OMNOVA Solutions’ Q3 2019 earnings at $0.18 EPS.

  • [By Motley Fool Staff]

    OMNOVA Solutions (NYSE:OMN) Q2 2018 Earnings Conference CallJun. 28, 2018 11:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Motley Fool Transcribing]

    OMNOVA Solutions (NYSE:OMN) Q3 2018 Earnings Conference CallSep. 26, 2018 11:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Compass Diversified Holdings(CODI)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Purple Innovation (NYSE: CODI) and Compass Diversified (NYSE:CODI) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

  • [By Jim Crumly]

    Canadian marijuana producer Tilray is jumping into the U.S. hemp and cannabidiol (CBD) oil market in a big way, buying Manitoba Harvest from Compass Diversified Holdings (NYSE:CODI) in a cash-and-stock deal worth up to 419 million Canadian dollars. Shares of Tilray bounced 5.3% on the news and those of Compass rose 2.7%.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Schroder Investment Management Group grew its stake in Compass Diversified Holdings (NYSE:CODI) by 3.2% in the 1st quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 1,097,576 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after purchasing an additional 33,776 shares during the period. Schroder Investment Management Group owned approximately 1.83% of Compass Diversified worth $18,000,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.(TLF)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Press coverage about Tandy Leather Factory (NASDAQ:TLF) has trended somewhat positive on Sunday, according to Accern Sentiment. The research group rates the sentiment of news coverage by monitoring more than 20 million blog and news sources. Accern ranks coverage of public companies on a scale of negative one to positive one, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. Tandy Leather Factory earned a news sentiment score of 0.07 on Accern’s scale. Accern also gave press coverage about the textile maker an impact score of 48.0642054684382 out of 100, meaning that recent news coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an impact on the company’s share price in the near term.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Tandy Leather Factory (NASDAQ: TLF) and Vera Bradley (NASDAQ:VRA) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Seaboard Corporation(SEB)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Willis Investment Counsel lifted its holdings in Seaboard Co. (NYSEAMERICAN:SEB) by 8.5% during the 1st quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 524 shares of the company’s stock after acquiring an additional 41 shares during the period. Willis Investment Counsel’s holdings in Seaboard were worth $2,235,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

Top 10 Performing Stocks To Own For 2019: Becton, Dickinson and Company(BDX)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Brian Orelli]

    Becton, Dickinson (NYSE:BDX) reported wacky results for its second fiscal quarter. This is the first quarter that the medical supply company has included results from its acquisition of C.R. Bard. But looking at the two companies on a comparable basis, it was a solid quarter for the newly combined company.

  • [By Brian Orelli]

    Becton, Dickinson and Company's (NYSE:BDX) first fiscal quarter of 2019 will be the last one with wacky year-over-year comparisons because of the addition of C.R. Bard. Fortunately, as it's done for the last three quarters, the company was kind enough to present the comparisons on a comparable currency-neutral basis as if the companies had been together in the year-ago quarter.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Becton Dickinson and (BDX)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    In other Becton Dickinson and news, CEO Vincent A. Forlenza sold 11,340 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, February 25th. The stock was sold at an average price of $250.40, for a total value of $2,839,536.00. Following the transaction, the chief executive officer now directly owns 227,250 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $56,903,400. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at the SEC website. Also, EVP Ribo Alberto Mas sold 4,808 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, March 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $255.03, for a total value of $1,226,184.24. Following the completion of the transaction, the executive vice president now directly owns 22,476 shares in the company, valued at $5,732,054.28. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold 19,271 shares of company stock worth $4,862,179 over the last ninety days. 0.12% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.

    ILLEGAL ACTIVITY WARNING: “Becton Dickinson and Co (BDX) Position Lifted by CIBC Asset Management Inc” was posted by Ticker Report and is owned by of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this report on another publication, it was stolen and republished in violation of United States & international copyright and trademark laws. The correct version of this report can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4205866/becton-dickinson-and-co-bdx-position-lifted-by-cibc-asset-management-inc.html.

    Becton Dickinson and Company Profile

  • [By Garrett Baldwin]

    Click here to learn more…

    Stocks to Watch Today: DIS, TMUS, BP, S Shares of Walt Disney Co. (NYSE: DIS) will lead a busy day of earnings reports. Wall Street is expecting a small decline in revenue for the first quarter. Disney is still in the process of absorbing most of Fox's assets from a deal last June. In addition, Disney will be launching its streaming service, Disney+, and investors will be looking for updates on the project. In deal news, T-Mobile U.S. Inc. (NYSE: TMUS) is looking to sweeten an offer to regulators to ensure a merger with rival Sprint Corp. (NYSE: S). The telecom giant told the U.S. Federal Communications Commission that it would freeze the prices of many plans if it receives approval for a deal. T-Mobile has offered $26 billion to buy Sprint. Shares of BP Plc. (NYSE: BP) rallied more than 3.7% after the global energy giant topped 2018 earnings expectations. The firm's big bets on shale developments have paid off. Profitability more than doubled over the previous year, while production topped out at 3.7 million barrels per day. Look for earnings reports from Allstate Corp. (NYSE: ALL), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: APC), Archer Daniels Midland Co. (NYSE: ADM), Becton, Dickenson & Co. (NYSE: BDX), BP Plc. (NYSE: BP), Chubb Ltd. (NYSE: CB), Digital Realty Trust (NYSE: DLR), Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR), Estee Lauder Co. Inc. (NYSE: EL), Lazard Ltd. (NYSE: LAZ), Pitney Bowes Inc. (NYSE: PBI), Plains All American Pipeline LP (NYSE: PAA), Ralph Lauren Corp. (NYSE: RL), Snap Inc. (NYSE: SNAP), and Tableau Software Inc. (NASDAQ: DATA).

    Follow Money Morning on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

  • [By Brian Feroldi]

    Here's are some of the biggest and best-know publicly traded diabetes companies:

    Company Ticker Market Cap Products  Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT) $126 billion Continuous glucose monitor AstraZeneca (NYSE: AZN) $95 billion Pharmaceuticals Becton, Dickinson (NYSE: BDX) $70 billion Diagnostic and delivery devices DexCom (NASDAQ:DXCM) $12.7  billion Continuous glucose monitor Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) $106 billion Insulin and pharmaceuticals Insulet   (NASDAQ:PODD) $6.1 billion Insulin pump Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) $375 billion  Glucose monitor and pharmaceuticals Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: LXRX) $1.2 billion Pharmaceuticals MannKind (NASDAQ: MNKD) $291 million Inhaled insulin Medtronic (NYSE: MDT) $133  billion Insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitor Novo Nordisk (NYSE:NVO) $116 billion Insulin and pharmaceuticals Sanofi (NYSE: SNY) $108 billion Insulin and pharmaceuticals Senseonics Holdings (NYSEMKT: SENS) $834 million Continuous glucose monitor

    DATA SOURCE: YAHOO! FINANCE. MARKET CAP DATA AS OF 9/25/2018. 

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Best Dividend Stocks To Watch For 2019

tags:ZUMZ,EZPW,CACI,

Technology stocks have historically been slow to embrace dividends, and until recently, Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) dividend history was no exception to that rule. After discontinuing a token payout in the mid-1990s, Apple went more than 15 years without making any dividend payouts at all. Yet now, the tech giant has not only started paying dividends but has increased them regularly, giving it a respectable yield even after a big run higher for its stock. Moreover, its modest payout ratio gives it plenty of room to boost scheduled quarterly dividends further in the future. Let's look more closely at Apple's dividend history to get a better sense of how the tech company has come to be a giant in the dividend world as well.

Apple's history of dividend payments

Apple has a long history of paying dividends, but it also has a long gap in the middle of its dividend history. From 1987 to 1995, it paid quarterly dividends that ranged from $0.06 to $0.12 per share, but that was before three subsequent stock splits that have given longtime investors 28 Apple shares for every one share they owned during that time span. Then in 1995, Apple suspended its dividends, choosing instead to focus on growth initiatives.

Best Dividend Stocks To Watch For 2019: Zumiez Inc.(ZUMZ)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Zumiez (NASDAQ:ZUMZ) was downgraded by investment analysts at ValuEngine from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note issued to investors on Thursday.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Zumiez’s (NASDAQ:ZUMZ) same-store sales increased by 4.9% during the month of January. Zumiez’s stock rose by 7.6% in the first full-day of trading following the news.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Divisar Capital Management LLC reduced its position in shares of Zumiez Inc. (NASDAQ:ZUMZ) by 81.6% in the 2nd quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The firm owned 26,994 shares of the apparel and footwear maker’s stock after selling 120,085 shares during the period. Zumiez comprises approximately 0.2% of Divisar Capital Management LLC’s holdings, making the stock its 26th largest position. Divisar Capital Management LLC’s holdings in Zumiez were worth $676,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Zumiez (ZUMZ)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    DA Davidson initiated coverage on shares of Zumiez (NASDAQ:ZUMZ) in a report published on Tuesday, The Fly reports. The firm issued a neutral rating on the apparel and footwear maker’s stock.

Best Dividend Stocks To Watch For 2019: EZCORP, Inc.(EZPW)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    EZCORP (NASDAQ:EZPW) posted its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday. The credit services provider reported $0.14 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, missing the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of $0.15 by ($0.01), Bloomberg Earnings reports. The company had revenue of $199.94 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $198.24 million. EZCORP had a return on equity of 6.81% and a net margin of 5.33%. EZCORP’s quarterly revenue was up 8.9% on a year-over-year basis. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm posted $0.12 EPS.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    EZCORP (NASDAQ: EZPW) and Zagg (NASDAQ:ZAGG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on EZCORP (EZPW)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Best Dividend Stocks To Watch For 2019: CACI International, Inc.(CACI)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Garrett Baldwin]

    By submitting your email address you will receive a free subscription to Profit Alerts and occasional special offers from Money Map Press and our affiliates. You can unsubscribe at anytime and we encourage you to read more about our privacy policy.

    Three Stocks to Watch Today: CSCO, M, BLK The earnings report calendar is headlined today by Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO). The tech giant will report fiscal fourth-quarter earnings after the bell. Wall Street expects that the firm will report earnings per share (EPS) of $0.69 on top of $12.77 billion in revenue. Shares of Macy's Inc. (NYSE: M) are on the move after the company reported earnings before the bell. The iconic retailer reported adjusted EPS of $0.70 on top of $5.57 billion in revenue. Wall Street had expected EPS of $0.49 on top of $5.61 billion in revenue. Shares of Macy's stock were off 5.3% in premarket hours. George Soros' firm Soros Fund Management increased its stake in shares of Blackrock Inc. (NYSE: BLK) by a whopping 60% in the second quarter, according to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing. If you were using Money Morning's proprietary Stock VQScore™, you'd have known that Blackrock was sitting in the "Buy Zone" before the SEC filing was made public. The global asset manager has a perfect 4.75 score, and it will look to blast off now that other investors start to follow Soros and other institutional investors that love this stock. To learn more about the Money Morning Stock VQScore, go here right now. Look for additional earnings reports from NetApp Inc. (Nasdaq: NTAP), MSG Networks Inc. (NYSE: MSGN), CACI International Inc. (NYSE: CACI), Briggs & Stratton Corp. (NYSE: BGG), SpartanNash Co. (Nasdaq: SPTN), and Luxoft Holding Inc. (NYSE: LXFT).

    Follow Money Morning on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    CACI INTERNATIONAL INC Common Stock (NYSE:CACI) has been assigned a consensus recommendation of “Buy” from the seventeen ratings firms that are covering the firm, Marketbeat.com reports. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell recommendation, four have assigned a hold recommendation, eleven have issued a buy recommendation and one has assigned a strong buy recommendation to the company. The average twelve-month target price among analysts that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is $190.23.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Caci International (NYSE:CACI)‘s stock had its “buy” rating reaffirmed by stock analysts at Cowen in a research report issued on Sunday. They presently have a $190.00 price objective on the information technology services provider’s stock. Cowen’s price objective would indicate a potential upside of 12.80% from the stock’s current price.

  • [By Lou Whiteman]

    CACI (NYSE:CACI) earlier this year fell short in its audacious bid to steal CSRA from the arms of General Dynamics, but the company did walk away with an attractive consolation prize from the deal.

  • [By Rich Smith]

    Let's start with the story that sparked the rally. Last night, Reuters cited three sources "familiar with the matter" saying that Engility "is exploring a sale" -- perhaps to CACI International (NYSE:CACI) or Science Applications International Corp (NYSE:SAIC), two peer defense contractors that are both three to four times larger than Engility.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    CACI (NYSE:CACI) shares hit a new 52-week high and low on Thursday . The company traded as low as $168.20 and last traded at $167.30, with a volume of 993 shares changing hands. The stock had previously closed at $167.55.

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Hot Biotech Stocks To Buy Right Now

tags:AMGN,ARQL,ALNY,BIIB,

Biotech stocks are known for dramatic gains, and this year's top performers are helping the industry live up to its reputation. Investors excited about the future of gene therapy have seen CRISPR Therapeutics AG (NASDAQ:CRSP) more than quadruple its shareholders' money over the past year.

The gene-editing stock has put up a dazzling performance, but it pales in comparison to Endocyte Inc. (NASDAQ:MRNS) and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:ARWR), which have absolutely exploded lately. Let's look at what's next for these high-flying biotech stocks to see if any have a shot at climbing further.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. Endocyte Inc.: Waiting for a Vision 

Shares of this precommercial biotech have risen a spectacular 807% over the past year as investors become increasingly confident about its new lead candidate's chances. The radioactive cancer treatment called Lu-PSMA-617 recently began a pivotal trial called Vision that will test its ability to increase overall survival for prostate cancer patients that have run out of treatment options.

Hot Biotech Stocks To Buy Right Now: Amgen Inc.(AMGN)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Philadelphia Trust Co. decreased its holdings in Amgen, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) by 8.0% during the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 74,676 shares of the medical research company’s stock after selling 6,501 shares during the quarter. Amgen makes up 1.2% of Philadelphia Trust Co.’s portfolio, making the stock its 22nd biggest position. Philadelphia Trust Co.’s holdings in Amgen were worth $13,784,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

  • [By Cory Renauer]

    A government proposal in the works could lead to important changes that benefit patients and drugmakers, but the industry isn't going to wait that long. Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) recently fired a big arrow at the bulging rebate bubble following signs of success from Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) and Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD). Here's what you need to know about their effort to change the drug pricing landscape.   

  • [By Keith Speights]

    It's a big drugmaker with a blockbuster immunology drug as its top-selling product. It pays an attractive dividend. And it faces some uncertainties. This description fits Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN), but it applies just as well to Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ).

  • [By Todd Campbell]

    When a brand new class of cholesterol-lowering drugs called PCSK9 inhibitors won Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2015, it was heralded as the biggest advance in battling heart disease since the invention of statins. The launch of PCSK9 inhibitors was accompanied by billion-dollar-plus predictions for sales. However, revenue has fallen far shy of blockbuster status, leaving drugmakers Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:REGN), and Sanofi SA (NYSE:SNY) in the lurch.

Hot Biotech Stocks To Buy Right Now: ArQule Inc.(ARQL)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    ValuEngine upgraded shares of ArQule (NASDAQ:ARQL) from a buy rating to a strong-buy rating in a research report released on Tuesday.

    Several other equities analysts have also issued reports on ARQL. Zacks Investment Research upgraded ArQule from a hold rating to a buy rating and set a $2.50 price objective for the company in a research report on Tuesday, March 20th. BidaskClub upgraded ArQule from a buy rating to a strong-buy rating in a research report on Saturday, March 24th. B. Riley set a $4.00 price objective on ArQule and gave the company a buy rating in a research report on Monday, March 26th. Leerink Swann upgraded ArQule from a market perform rating to an outperform rating in a research report on Thursday, April 5th. Finally, Roth Capital boosted their price objective on ArQule from $5.00 to $6.00 and gave the company a buy rating in a research report on Tuesday, April 17th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, five have assigned a buy rating and two have issued a strong buy rating to the stock. The company has a consensus rating of Buy and a consensus target price of $5.35.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on ArQule (ARQL)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on ArQule (ARQL)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on ArQule (ARQL)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Hot Biotech Stocks To Buy Right Now: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.(ALNY)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    BidaskClub lowered shares of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALNY) from a strong-buy rating to a buy rating in a research report released on Monday.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcription]

    Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALNY)Q4 2019 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 7, 2017, 4:30 p.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Jim Crumly]

    As for individual stocks, shares of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALNY) fell despite the announcement of its first-ever drug approval, and those of Sysco (NYSE:SYY) rose on earnings.

  • [By Brian Orelli]

    The delay in an FDA decision for Tegsedi puts it behind competitor Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALNY), which expects to hear from the FDA by Aug. 11 for its hATTR drug patisiran. But Sarah Boyce, the president at Akcea Therapeutics, doesn't think a few months will really matter: "We don't really feel that's going to have any impact and the drugs will be close enough together from a launch perspective. So not really [going] to make any adjustments, and we're very well prepared to be ready to launch following approval."

Hot Biotech Stocks To Buy Right Now: Biogen Idec Inc(BIIB)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Chris Lange]

    The S&P 500 stock posting the largest daily percentage loss ahead of the close Monday was Biogen Inc. (NASDAQ: BIIB) which traded down nearly 4% at $329.58. The stock's 52-week range is $244.28 to $348.84. Volume was 1.2 million matching the daily average of 1.2 million shares.

  • [By Chris Lange]

    Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: IONS) shares made a handy gain on Friday after the firm announced an expanded strategic collaboration with Biogen Inc. (NASDAQ: BIIB). Through this partnership, these companies are planning to tackle and develop novel antisense drug candidates for a broad range of neurological diseases.

  • [By Chris Lange]

    Short interest in Biogen Inc. (NASDAQ: BIIB) increased to 3.50 million shares from the previous 3.16 million. The stock recently traded at $262.15, within a 52-week range of $244.28 to $370.57.

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Here are the ETFs with the most exposure to Boeing

The sharp decline in shares of Boeing was felt across the stock market Monday, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average down more than 200 points at the lows of the session. The stock shed more than 13 percent after the aircraft manufacturer saw its second 737 MAX 8 plane crash in less than five months on Sunday.

Boeing is not only one of the biggest point drivers for the Dow, but its impact can also be felt in 215 U.S.-listed exchange-traded funds. The three ETFs with the most exposure to Boeing are the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF, with 13 percent exposure; the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF, with 11 percent exposure; and the Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund, with 10 percent exposure.

Experts said there are a few paths that investors with exposure to Boeing should consider.

"Weigh in the news. Do your homework," Chris Hempstead, head of ETF trading at Deutsche Bank, tells CNBC's "ETF Edge." "If you're a retail investor, read as much as you can. Get a sense of where you want to be with this kind of news. Decide how far the market is taking these stocks down as a result of the news, and if that's something you disagree with, you want to go in."

Investors who are bullish on the company's prospects should start positions in the ETFs with the most exposure to Boeing, Hempstead said Monday, but they should also remember just how much scale that stock has.

"Keep in mind: a name like Boeing is in more than just those aerospace and defense ETFs. There is massive exposure to Boeing in the S&P 500 ETFs from iShares, Vanguard and State Street," Hempstead said. "So it's going to move the markets one way or another, but depending on where you value Boeing, it should direct you to which ETFs you choose."

John Davi, founder, CEO and CIO of Astoria Portfolio Advisors, called Boeing's widespread influence on the industrial sector and the stock market as a whole "a double-edged sword."

"Obviously, when you have good news, it benefits you, and bad news, it'll hurt you. So, if you're uncomfortable with that risk-reward, then maybe you need to look at something that's a little bit more equal-weighted," he told "ETF Edge."

Boeing shares have gained some 300 percent in the last five years, double the advance of the S&P 500.

Disclaimer

Monday, March 11, 2019

Tecnoglass Inc (TGLS) Files 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended on December 31, 2018

Tecnoglass Inc (NASDAQ:TGLS) files its latest 10-K with SEC for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2018. Tecnoglass Inc designs, manufactures, distributes, and markets architectural glass and windows. The company's products portfolio includes tempered, laminated, insulating and Low-E glass. Tecnoglass Inc has a market cap of $337.240 million; its shares were traded at around $8.99 with a P/E ratio of 23.73 and P/S ratio of 0.90. The dividend yield of Tecnoglass Inc stocks is 6.24%.

For the last quarter Tecnoglass Inc reported a revenue of $97.0 million, compared with the revenue of $83.38 million during the same period a year ago. For the latest fiscal year the company reported a revenue of $371.0 million, an increase of 18% from last year. For the last five years Tecnoglass Inc had an average revenue decline of 0% a year.

The reported diluted earnings per share was 22 cents for the year, an increase of 37.5% from previous year. The Tecnoglass Inc had a decent operating margin of 12.72%, compared with the operating margin of 10.93% a year before. The 10-year historical median operating margin of Tecnoglass Inc is 14.74%. The profitability rank of the company is 6 (out of 10).

At the end of the fiscal year, Tecnoglass Inc has the cash and cash equivalents of $33.0 million, compared with $40.9 million in the previous year. The long term debt was $220.7 million, compared with $221.0 million in the previous year. The interest coverage to the debt is 2.2, which is not a favorable level. Tecnoglass Inc has a financial strength rank of 5 (out of 10).

At the current stock price of $8.99, Tecnoglass Inc is traded at 29.8% discount to its historical median P/S valuation band of $12.80. The P/S ratio of the stock is 0.90, while the historical median P/S ratio is 1.26. The stock gained 2.50% during the past 12 months.

Directors and Officers Recent Trades:

Director Martha L Byorum sold 5,994 shares of TGLS stock on 02/13/2019 at the average price of $8.46. The price of the stock has increased by 6.26% since.Director Martha L Byorum sold 5,994 shares of TGLS stock on 02/13/2019 at the average price of $8.46. The price of the stock has increased by 6.26% since.

For the complete 20-year historical financial data of TGLS, click here.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Will This State Be the 8th to Have No Income Tax?

Tax season is upon us, and most taxpayers are focused primarily on figuring out their federal income tax returns. With reform efforts having changed many key provisions of the tax code, adapting to the new set of tax laws has proven onerous for many.

Yet at the same time, Americans in the vast majority of states also have to worry about state income taxes. Only seven states have allowed their residents to escape the double-hit of having to prepare a state income tax return and make payments to state tax collectors. However, there could be an eighth state on track to join this elite group -- if another state doesn't beat it to the punch.

Flag with red background and centered circle with blue background and three white stars.

Image source: Getty Images.

The seven states with no income taxes currently

Right now, seven states have no state income taxes. If you live in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, or Wyoming, then you won't have to pay any income tax at the state level.

Of course, that doesn't mean that these state governments don't collect other sorts of taxes to make up for the lack of an income tax. In Alaska, Texas, and Wyoming, levies on natural resources provide much of the revenue that runs state government, while key industrial concentrations like the casino industry in Nevada and the credit card industry in South Dakota play a monumental role in helping residents stay income-tax free.

State governments recognize the appeal that having no income tax can have in influencing decisions about where to live. In particular, retirees looking for more affordable places to live often choose to move to tax-friendlier locations that allow them to stretch their financial resources further.

Tennessee is set to join the list

The state of Tennessee looked at those arguments in favor of cutting state income taxes and came to the conclusion in 2016 that it made sense to eliminate it. Even before the move, Tennessee's income tax applied only to investment income from stocks and bonds, including most interest and dividends but excluding interest from bank and credit union accounts. A 6% rate applied to taxpayers for much of the tax's history.

In 2016, the legislature passed a law reducing the rate on the tax from 6% to 5% and set in motion a plan to eliminate the tax entirely. That reform measure was finalized in 2017, with the tax rate falling by one percentage point from 2017 to 2020 before finally going away entirely by 2021.

Could other states get there first?

Tennessee is far from the only state to consider getting rid of its income tax. At the same time that Tennessee took action, several other state governments were looking at measures to try to eliminate income taxes at the state level. Governors in Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, and South Carolina were among those examining such proposals. More recently, some officeholders and candidates in more surprising locations such as Connecticut have discussed the potential positive impacts of eliminating state income tax -- especially now that federal law limits itemized deductions for those taxes.

Yet the road toward going tax-free at the state level also has potential obstacles. The experience of Kansas shows the roadblocks that can come up, with Republican Gov. Sam Brownback having supported large tax cuts in the early 2010s that included the elimination of pass-through taxation on businesses and reductions in the individual income tax rate. Many lawmakers intended for further reductions in tax rates that residents paid in future years, with the goal of eventually eliminating them. However, after controversy and financial distress, Kansas lawmakers started boosting income taxes over the past couple of years.

Keep your eyes on the Volunteer State

At this point, even if other states decided to eliminate their income taxes, they'd likely do so using a phased-in approach similar to what Tennessee did. As a result, the Volunteer State is almost certain to cross the finish line as the eighth tax-free U.S. state. That's good news for Tennessee residents, and it'll be interesting to see if it prompts an additional influx of people trying to escape state taxes elsewhere.

6 of the Most Expensive Stocks That Could Go On Sale

The most expensive stocks often receive a disproportionate share of the coverage in the financial news industry. Since those stocks often emerge from cutting-edge industries, they tend to win investor attention as they often represent the future.

Assuming the company earns a profit, they usually get classified as the most expensive stock through their price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. The average P/E ratio for an S&P 500 company comes in at about 21.4. However, these stocks command much higher P/E ratios, often into the triple digits. Due to their usually phenomenal growth, these stocks can maintain triple-digit multiples for years.

However, high growth rarely lasts forever. While slowing growth rarely makes these equities cheap stocks, it becomes a time when many of the most expensive stocks go on sale. These six equities, which have often become the most expensive stocks in the recent past, appear poised to trade at sale prices:


Compare Brokers
Fade Chipotle Stock As It Rallies Towards $500Fade Chipotle Stock As It Rallies Towards $500Source: Shutterstock

Chipotle (CMG)

Fast-food stocks rarely make it on a list of most expensive stocks, but the success of the healthy fast food trend Chipotle (NYSE:CMG) pioneered has taken that equity to record highs. Not even outbreaks of E. coli or other cases of food poisoning have not permanently derailed its move higher.

Today, CMG stock trades at a P/E of 98. Profit growth takes the forward P/E to just under 40. However, I think Chipotle’s days of trading at an elevated multiple may end soon. Other fast-food eateries have latched on to the healthy food trend. Restaurants such as Zoë’s Kitchen, Modern Market and many others have emerged. Moreover, established brands such as McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) now offer healthier options.

Most remain private for now, but as more of these firms launch IPO’s, investors will have several healthy fast-food restaurants from which to choose. Wall Street expects Chipotle to increase profits by an average of 24% per year for the next five years. For this reason, I expect a more gradual drop in the P/E ratio. However, over time I think CMG stock will eventually fall to a P/E ratio comparable to that of McDonald’s. Since that trend has already begun, I would recommend avoiding CMG stock at these levels.


Compare Brokers
High Multiples and Lack of Moat Make Godaddy Inc (GDDY) a Stock to AvoidHigh Multiples and Lack of Moat Make Godaddy Inc (GDDY) a Stock to AvoidSource: Shutterstock

GoDaddy (GDDY)

The public may know GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY) best for Super Bowl commercials. However, it earns revenue as a domain registrar and web hosting service. Despite its thin-moat business, it has managed to acquire 18 million customers and hold 77 million domain names under management. This strategy has helped GDDY stock grow to a P/E ratio of 164 and will bring a 73.3% profit increase this year if Wall Street’s forecasts come to fruition.

However, I think the weak moat makes profit forecasts untrustworthy. The problem for GDDY is that consumers who want to register a domain or find web hosting have numerous companies from which to choose. Hence, the Super Bowl commercials and the GoDaddy name constitute its entire moat. Moreover, Danica Patrick’s retirement from racing has reduced the exposure she brought to the company. If people start to remember that other hosting companies exist, it could lead to a lower market share and reduced profit growth.

Despite the problems, I think highly of GoDaddy as a company. Achieving this level of earnings growth in a business with almost no moat stands as an impressive feat. However, I think that weak moat means GDDY stock will not stay on the most expensive stocks list for much longer.


Compare Brokers
Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS)Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS)Source: Shutterstock

Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS)

Ionis (NASDAQ:IONS) specializes in antisense technology. This allows for the manipulation of genes to treat diseases. The company is best known for the drug Spinraza, a therapy which it developed with Biogen (NASDAQ:BIIB) for spinal muscular atrophy. Ionis also leads the way in RNA therapies.

Where it cannot seem to lead the way is in stock price growth. IONS stock trades at around $70 per share. This takes it to a record high, but it also means it could form a double-top as it slightly exceeds the record levels in 2015. Moreover, the spike in profits in 2018 occurred from a one-time, $292 million tax event in the fourth quarter. Without such events, the forward P/E ratio rises to just above 201.

Analysts predict an average profit growth rate of 40% per year for the next five years. However, with drops in earnings coming for both this year and next, one has to wonder whether that forecast will hold. Even if IONS stock makes or exceeds that profit growth, whether it justifies its high multiple remains in question. While I expect Ionis to develop innovative therapies, measuring how much they succeed remains difficult. Between the possible double top in the charts, a 201 forward P/E and an uncertain future, I find it difficult to stay optimistic about the near-term prospects of IONS stock.


Compare Brokers
netflix stocknetflix stockSource: Vivian D Nguyen via Flickr (Modified)

Netflix (NFLX)

As the pioneer in streaming video, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) stock has remained a growth powerhouse for many years. Triple-digit P/E ratios and threats from competing streaming services have failed to stop the growth in NFLX stock. Over the last few years, Netflix has maintained this growth by developing award-winning, popular content and partnering with the likes of Disney (NYSE:DIS) to offer a wide variety of viewing choices.

However, Disney now plans to offer its own streaming service. With that, much of its popular content switches from a company asset to a competitive threat. Moreover, the high costs of in-house content development have increased the debt load on Netflix’s balance sheet. Netflix has increased fees to mitigate that cost. However, with Disney charging only $4.95 for its ESPN+ streaming services, they could choose to undercut Netflix and diminish the company’s ability to increase fees.

Granted, streaming services are a bargain compared to the traditional pay TV services. For this reason, rising prices may not lead to revenue declines. Still, in a world with many peers, maintaining the high multiple of NFLX stock could become difficult. Moreover, the forward P/E ratio, which now stands at just under 55, has fallen in recent years. This could trigger further stock dilution as Netflix needs options to pay down its debt. I expect Netflix to remain a content powerhouse for years to come, but with rising debts and increased competition, NFLX will probably not stay on the list of most expensive stocks.


Compare Brokers
Shopify Stock Could Be on Its Way to Making New HighsShopify Stock Could Be on Its Way to Making New HighsSource: Shopify via Flickr

Shopify (SHOP)

I have often referred to Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) stock as the “anti-Amazon,” the company that allows one to set up shop without the help of online giant Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Shopify’s platform allows any entrepreneur to build and operate an online store with minimal development skills. Given that reality, one can see why it earned its place on many most expensive stocks lists.

Since it trades at over 18 times sales and almost ten times book value, most would call SHOP stock pricey. Moreover, factors have emerged that would call these multiples as well as its 216.9 forward P/E ratio into question. Competitors such as WooCommerce and Magento, a product owned by Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE) offer credible alternative platforms to online entrepreneurs. Amazon and Square (NYSE:SQ) have also targeted its customer base.

Wall Street expects average earnings increases of 56.3% per year over the next five years. Also, all e-commerce platform developers should benefit from the massive growth the industry will enjoy for the foreseeable future. However, Shopify has yet to turn an annual profit. With all of the available alternatives, more investors will probably question the current valuation of SHOP stock.


Compare Brokers
Twilio Stock Has Become More Pie in the Sky Than CloudTwilio Stock Has Become More Pie in the Sky Than CloudSource: Web Summit Via Flickr

Twilio (TWLO)

Twilio (NYSE:TWLO) has earned its designation among the most expensive stocks with its forward P/E ratio of almost 430. TWLO dominates the platform-as-a-service (PaaS) for cloud-based APIs. In layman’s terms, this is the technology that enables firms such as Uber to operate their services.

Although analysts foresee profits falling this year, they believe earnings will grow by an average 36.5% per year over the next five years. I think this rate of increase deserves a higher-than-average multiple. However, this growth rate still cannot possibly justify a 430 forward P/E multiple.

Moreover, competition has become an increasing threat as smaller competitors have emerged. TWLO stock fell recently when news came out that Uber was looking to reduce its dependence on Twilio. The stock could also drop precipitously if companies such as Amazon (who serves as Twilio’s hosting company) or Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL) decide to enter this market.

No matter the size of Twilio’s direct peers, competition will pose an increasing threat. I expect this industry to see massive growth over the next few years. However, even exponential growth has its limits. With its 400-plus forward P/E and new competitors emerging, I think TWLO stock has nowhere to go but down.

As of this writing, Will Healy did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned stocks. You can follow Will on Twitter

Thursday, March 7, 2019

The First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund ETF's Holdings Imply 10% Gain Potential

&l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image getty size-large wp-image-1133742453&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/1133742453/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Getty

Looking at the underlying holdings of the ETFs in our coverage universe at &l;a href=&q;https://www.etfchannel.com/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;ETF Channel&l;/a&g;, we have compared the trading price of each holding against the average analyst 12-month forward target price, and computed the weighted average implied analyst target price for the ETF itself.&a;nbsp; For the First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund ETF, we found that the implied analyst target price for the ETF based upon its underlying holdings is $68.00 per unit.

With FXL trading at a recent price near $61.84 per unit, that means that analysts see 9.96% upside for this ETF looking through to the average analyst targets of the underlying holdings. Three of FXL&s;s underlying holdings with notable upside to their analyst target prices are PTC, Monolithic Power Systems and RingCentral. Although PTC has traded at a recent price of $89.96/share, the average analyst target is 12.27% higher at $101.00/share. Similarly, MPWR has 11.45% upside from the recent share price of $134.93 if the average analyst target price of $150.38/share is reached, and analysts on average are expecting RNG to reach a target price of $113.50/share, which is 11.00% above the recent price of $102.25.

Below is a summary table of the current analyst target prices discussed above:

&a;nbsp;

&l;/p&g;&l;div class=&q;table-wrapper&q;&g;&l;table class=&q;hctblstyle&q; border=&q;0&q; cellspacing=&q;0&q; cellpadding=&q;0&q;&g;&l;tbody&g;&l;tr&g;&l;th&g;Name&l;/th&g; &l;th align=&q;center&q;&g;Symbol&l;/th&g; &l;th align=&q;right&q;&g;Recent Price&l;/th&g; &l;th align=&q;right&q;&g;Avg. Analyst 12-Mo. Target&l;/th&g; &l;th align=&q;right&q;&g;% Upside to Target&l;/th&g; &l;/tr&g;&l;tr&g;&l;td&g;&l;b&g;First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund ETF&l;/b&g;&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;center&q;&g;&l;b&g;FXL&l;/b&g;&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;&l;b&g;$61.84&l;/b&g;&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;&l;b&g;$68.00&l;/b&g;&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;&l;b&g;9.96%&l;/b&g;&l;/td&g; &l;/tr&g;&l;tr&g;&l;td&g;PTC Inc&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;center&q;&g;PTC&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;$89.96&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;$101.00&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;12.27%&l;/td&g; &l;/tr&g;&l;tr&g;&l;td&g;Monolithic Power Systems Inc&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;center&q;&g;MPWR&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;$134.93&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;$150.38&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;11.45%&l;/td&g; &l;/tr&g;&l;tr&g;&l;td&g;RingCentral Inc&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;center&q;&g;RNG&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;$102.25&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;$113.50&l;/td&g; &l;td align=&q;right&q;&g;11.00%&l;/td&g; &l;/tr&g;&l;/tbody&g;&l;/table&g;&l;/div&g;

Are analysts justified in these targets, or overly optimistic about where these stocks will be trading 12 months from now? Do the analysts have a valid justification for their targets, or are they behind the curve on recent company and industry developments? A high price target relative to a stock&s;s trading price can reflect optimism about the future, but can also be a precursor to target price downgrades if the targets were a relic of the past. These are questions that require further investor research.

&l;a href=&q;http://www.etfchannel.com/slideshows/ten-etfs-with-most-upside/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Click here to find out 10 ETFs With Most Upside To Analyst Targets &a;raquo;&l;/a&g;

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Toll Brothers Inc (TOL) Given Average Rating of “Hold” by Brokerages

Toll Brothers Inc (NYSE:TOL) has been assigned a consensus rating of “Hold” from the eighteen brokerages that are covering the company, MarketBeat reports. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell recommendation, eleven have given a hold recommendation and five have assigned a buy recommendation to the company. The average 1 year price objective among brokers that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $41.31.

Several equities research analysts have issued reports on the company. Zacks Investment Research downgraded Toll Brothers from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a report on Monday, December 10th. Royal Bank of Canada downgraded Toll Brothers from an “outperform” rating to a “sector perform” rating and set a $37.00 price objective for the company. in a report on Thursday, December 6th. Wedbush reiterated a “neutral” rating and set a $36.00 price objective (down from $44.00) on shares of Toll Brothers in a report on Tuesday, December 4th. Raymond James set a $40.00 price objective on Toll Brothers and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Friday, March 1st. Finally, Credit Suisse Group reiterated a “hold” rating and set a $37.00 price objective on shares of Toll Brothers in a report on Friday, February 15th.

Get Toll Brothers alerts:

In related news, CFO Martin P. Connor sold 12,000 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, February 5th. The stock was sold at an average price of $36.83, for a total transaction of $441,960.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief financial officer now directly owns 76,504 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $2,817,642.32. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through the SEC website. Also, Director Paul E. Shapiro sold 5,539 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, December 14th. The shares were sold at an average price of $32.18, for a total value of $178,245.02. Following the transaction, the director now directly owns 108,916 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $3,504,916.88. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Over the last quarter, insiders have sold 32,039 shares of company stock valued at $1,128,770. 9.69% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.

Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently modified their holdings of the stock. OLD National Bancorp IN acquired a new position in Toll Brothers during the fourth quarter valued at approximately $216,000. Sterling Investment Advisors Ltd. acquired a new position in Toll Brothers during the fourth quarter valued at approximately $1,817,000. IFP Advisors Inc boosted its position in Toll Brothers by 527.3% during the third quarter. IFP Advisors Inc now owns 12,420 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $410,000 after purchasing an additional 10,440 shares during the last quarter. BBT Capital Management LLC acquired a new position in Toll Brothers during the third quarter valued at approximately $830,000. Finally, M&T Bank Corp boosted its position in Toll Brothers by 17.3% during the fourth quarter. M&T Bank Corp now owns 21,708 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $714,000 after purchasing an additional 3,206 shares during the last quarter. 83.07% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

Shares of Toll Brothers stock opened at $35.03 on Wednesday. Toll Brothers has a 1 year low of $28.68 and a 1 year high of $45.76. The stock has a market capitalization of $5.48 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 7.44, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.51 and a beta of 1.04. The company has a quick ratio of 1.27, a current ratio of 6.83 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.78.

Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, February 26th. The construction company reported $0.76 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $0.61 by $0.15. Toll Brothers had a return on equity of 15.93% and a net margin of 10.47%. The company had revenue of $1.36 billion during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $1.26 billion. During the same period in the prior year, the company earned $0.83 earnings per share. The company’s revenue for the quarter was up 16.0% compared to the same quarter last year. On average, research analysts predict that Toll Brothers will post 4.61 EPS for the current fiscal year.

Toll Brothers Company Profile

Toll Brothers, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, designs, builds, markets, sells, and arranges finance for detached and attached homes in luxury residential communities in the United States. The company operates in two segments, Traditional Home Building and City Living. It also designs, builds, markets, and sells homes in urban infill markets through Toll Brothers City Living.

See Also: What is the balance sheet?

Analyst Recommendations for Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL)

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

State of Tennessee Treasury Department Purchases 105,300 Shares of iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corpor

State of Tennessee Treasury Department boosted its position in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:HYG) by 173.5% during the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The fund owned 166,000 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock after buying an additional 105,300 shares during the quarter. State of Tennessee Treasury Department owned approximately 0.10% of iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF worth $13,463,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

Other institutional investors have also recently made changes to their positions in the company. We Are One Seven LLC bought a new position in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF in the fourth quarter valued at approximately $33,000. Country Trust Bank raised its holdings in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF by 47.7% in the 4th quarter. Country Trust Bank now owns 424 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $34,000 after acquiring an additional 137 shares in the last quarter. Strategic Wealth Partners Ltd. raised its holdings in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF by 117.1% in the 4th quarter. Strategic Wealth Partners Ltd. now owns 558 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $47,000 after acquiring an additional 301 shares in the last quarter. Patriot Financial Group Insurance Agency LLC raised its holdings in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF by 10.3% in the 4th quarter. Patriot Financial Group Insurance Agency LLC now owns 1,671 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $136,000 after acquiring an additional 156 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Westside Investment Management Inc. raised its holdings in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF by 54.5% in the 4th quarter. Westside Investment Management Inc. now owns 1,700 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $138,000 after acquiring an additional 600 shares in the last quarter.

Get iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF alerts:

NYSEARCA HYG traded up $0.04 during midday trading on Monday, hitting $85.65. The company had a trading volume of 105,415 shares, compared to its average volume of 23,412,291. iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF has a twelve month low of $79.55 and a twelve month high of $86.66.

The business also recently disclosed a monthly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, March 7th. Shareholders of record on Monday, March 4th will be issued a $0.3818 dividend. The ex-dividend date is Friday, March 1st. This represents a $4.58 annualized dividend and a yield of 5.35%.

ILLEGAL ACTIVITY WARNING: This story was published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this story on another site, it was copied illegally and republished in violation of international trademark and copyright law. The original version of this story can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4196102/state-of-tennessee-treasury-department-purchases-105300-shares-of-ishares-iboxx-high-yield-corporate-bond-etf-hyg.html.

About iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (the Fund), formerly iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond Fund, is an exchange-traded fund (ETF). The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index (the Index), which is a rules-based index consisting of liquid the United States dollar-denominated, high yield corporate bonds for sale in the United States, as determined by the index provider.

Recommended Story: What is an Initial Public Offering (IPO)?

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:HYG)

Monday, March 4, 2019

IG Group (IGG) Coverage Initiated by Analysts at Royal Bank of Canada

Royal Bank of Canada began coverage on shares of IG Group (LON:IGG) in a report published on Tuesday morning. The firm issued an outperform rating and a GBX 720 ($9.41) target price on the stock.

Other equities research analysts have also issued research reports about the company. Shore Capital reiterated a buy rating on shares of IG Group in a research report on Tuesday, January 22nd. Peel Hunt reiterated a buy rating on shares of IG Group in a research report on Tuesday, January 22nd. Numis Securities restated a buy rating and set a GBX 980 ($12.81) target price on shares of IG Group in a research report on Tuesday, October 30th. Liberum Capital restated a hold rating and set a GBX 693 ($9.06) target price on shares of IG Group in a research report on Monday, January 28th. Finally, Barclays restated an overweight rating and set a GBX 1,000 ($13.07) target price on shares of IG Group in a research report on Wednesday, December 5th. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have given a hold rating and six have given a buy rating to the company’s stock. IG Group currently has a consensus rating of Buy and an average price target of GBX 812 ($10.61).

Get IG Group alerts:

LON IGG opened at GBX 578 ($7.55) on Tuesday. IG Group has a 12 month low of GBX 487.82 ($6.37) and a 12 month high of GBX 837.50 ($10.94).

IG Group (LON:IGG) last released its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, January 22nd. The company reported GBX 24.90 ($0.33) EPS for the quarter.

The firm also recently announced a dividend, which was paid on Thursday, February 28th. Investors of record on Thursday, January 31st were given a dividend of GBX 12.96 ($0.17) per share. The ex-dividend date was Thursday, January 31st. This represents a dividend yield of 2.02%.

In other IG Group news, insider June Felix bought 17,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, January 23rd. The shares were bought at an average price of GBX 586 ($7.66) per share, for a total transaction of £99,620 ($130,171.17).

About IG Group

IG Group Holdings plc provides leveraged derivatives and spread betting under the IG brand worldwide. Its CFDs (contracts for difference) are derivatives contracts that enable clients to take advantage of changes in an asset's price. The company also offers clients access to a range of risk-mitigation measures, including stops and limits and a limited risk account; and products, such as share dealing and investment portfolios, as well as enables clients to hold their investments in ISAs and SIPPs.

Recommended Story: Price to Earnings Ratio (PE)

Analyst Recommendations for IG Group (LON:IGG)

Sunday, March 3, 2019

Jordan Promised $2B Economic Lifeline By Concerned Allies

&l;p&g;International partners have rallied around to offer fresh support for Jordan&a;rsquo;s beleaguered economy, with a number of large pledges made during a conference in London on February 28.

Among those to promise assistance was Japan, which said it would provide $730m over the next five years, and France, which promised &a;euro;1bn ($1.1bn) between 2019 and 2022. The host government also chipped in, with UK ministers announcing a number of different programs, the largest of which was the underwriting of a $250m soft loan via the World Bank.

Jordan&a;rsquo;s economy has long been weak, with high unemployment and limited local energy resources among its key challenges. In recent years the country has also had to shoulder the burden of huge numbers of refugees fleeing the violence in neighbouring Syria. The UNHCR says around currently 672,000 Syrian refugees are currently registered in Jordan, although other observers estimate the real number is likely to be closer to 1 million.

&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-2637&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/dominicdudley/files/2019/02/47185386172_a76f0188c8_z.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;King Abdullah II of Jordan, speaking at the conference at Kings Place, London on February 28 2019.&q; data-height=&q;427&q; data-width=&q;640&q;&g; King Abdullah II speaking at the Jordan Growth &a;amp; Opportunity conference at Kings Place, London on February 28, 2019 (photo: DFID)

Jordan is used to having unstable neighbours &a;ndash; it has Iraq to its east and the brittle West Bank on the other side. Despite this, it has managed to remain relatively calm over the years and maintaining that stability was the key motivation for the fresh bout of largesse on display in London.

The fragile nature of the economy and the government&s;s limited popular legitimacy &a;ndash; which stems from having a hereditary head of state and an appointed prime minister &a;ndash; have made it hard for the authorities to introduce much-needed fiscal reforms. Despite this, the administration of&a;nbsp;prime minister &l;span&g;Omar al-Razzaz&l;/span&g; has made some significant changes since taking office last year, cutting expenditure, eliminating some subsidies and introducing a new income tax system &a;ndash; the latter met with a &l;a href=&q;https://www.dw.com/en/jordan-hundreds-protest-revised-imf-backed-tax-law/a-46732132&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;hostile reaction&l;/a&g; from locals last year. A&l;span&g;l-Razzaz&l;/span&g; acknowledged the difficulties he has faced, telling the conference these were &a;ldquo;tough decisions&a;rdquo; which were &a;ldquo;not easy at a time of slow economic growth.&a;rdquo;

Despite this, the IMF has been urging the Jordanian government to press ahead with further reforms, although it warned in &l;a href=&q;https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2019/02/07/pr1934-imf-staff-reaches-agreement-on-policies-for-the-completion-of-the-2nd-review-of-jordans-eff&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;early February&l;/a&g; that &a;ldquo;t&l;span&g;hese policies and reforms need to be supported by significantly greater efforts from the international and regional donor community.&a;rdquo;&l;/span&g;

Clearly, some of Jordan&a;rsquo;s international partners now feel the time is right to give something back to the country to help it navigate the tricky waters it finds itself in. &q;A stable Jordan defends us from terrorist groups taking root and strengthens the border security of neighbouring countries. And that is why our collective support for Jordan is so crucial,&q; said British prime minister Theresa May at the conference.

&l;strong&g;Brexit&a;rsquo;s shadow&l;/strong&g;

For the UK there is another motivation. London is facing a potentially &l;a href=&q;https://www.forbes.com/sites/dominicdudley/2019/01/16/may-survives-no-confidence-vote/#714be603dab0&q;&g;chaotic exit&l;/a&g; from the European Union and is desperate to sign trade deals with other countries to try and soften the blow. Jordan is one of &l;a href=&q;https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46949431&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;more than 70 countries&l;/a&g; the EU has trade deals with &a;ndash; the association agreement with Amman has been in force since May 2002, creating a free &l;span&g;trade area between the two economies. &l;/span&g;

&l;span&g;International trade secretary Liam Fox has in the past made some &l;a href=&q;https://www.businessinsider.com/liam-fox-promises-to-sign-40-free-trade-deals-the-second-after-brexit-2017-10?r=US&a;amp;IR=T&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;hopelessly optimistic&l;/a&g; promises about his ability to roll over these deals; the reality is that &l;/span&g;he and his team are far behind schedule. In a statement issued last month, &a;nbsp;the government admitted it had signed trade agreements with just &l;a href=&q;https://www.gov.uk/guidance/signed-uk-trade-agreements-transitioned-from-the-eu&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;six partners&l;/a&g;, while seven others have signed either economic partnership agreements or mutual recognition agreements. It appears that deals with a further 31 trading partners will &l;a href=&q;https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/existing-trade-agreements-if-the-uk-leaves-the-eu-without-a-deal/existing-trade-agreements-if-the-uk-leaves-the-eu-without-a-deal&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;not be ready&l;/a&g; by the current Brexit date of March 29, including the one with Jordan.

&a;ldquo;There&s;s an association agreement we&s;re looking to roll over. We think we&s;re in a good place to do so,&a;rdquo; said one UK government source ahead of the conference. &a;ldquo;There&s;s a good base already and we will be very keen to transition any EU trade agreements. Of course they&s;ll be subject to the usually scrutiny from us and them. This is a place where the base of the agreement ought to be pretty good. We want to work with each other. We&s;re being supportive for Jordan&a;hellip; but I think, as we have all come to realize, they sometimes take a little bit longer than perhaps was originally envisaged.&a;rdquo;

However, not everything went smoothly at the London conference, whose popularity appeared to take the organisers by surprise. The main hall was clearly too small for the number of delegates and overflow rooms were at times either fully occupied or suffering from a breakdown in the live feed from the main stage.

Some of the UK government&a;rsquo;s announcements were also not quite ready to be implemented. Among a package of measures announced by international development secretary Penny Mordaunt was a &a;pound;25m programme called Skills for Development which is meant to help 200,000 young Jordanians gain English language and other workplace skills, although her department acknowledged that it is &a;ldquo;still under design&a;rdquo;.

&l;span&g;The Jordanian economy does have some advantages. It has a strong position in the regional media and technology markets, plenty of potential to attract more tourists and is rapidly building up its renewable energy generating capacity &a;ndash; b&l;/span&g;y next year it expects one fifth of its electricity demand to be met by renewable energy.

&l;span&g;But with economic growth last year of just 2.3%, it clearly still needs more help. &l;/span&g;&a;ldquo;Slow growth cannot take us to the future that we know is possible, and it cannot give us the jobs and better life that my people expect and deserve, especially after so much sacrifice&l;span&g;,&a;rdquo; King Abdullah II told the conference.&l;/span&g;&l;/p&g;

BWX Technologies (BWXT) Downgraded to “Underperform” at Bank of America

BWX Technologies (NYSE:BWXT) was downgraded by analysts at Bank of America from a “neutral” rating to an “underperform” rating in a research note issued on Friday, The Fly reports.

A number of other equities research analysts also recently commented on the stock. Zacks Investment Research downgraded shares of BWX Technologies from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Thursday. Maxim Group raised their price objective on shares of BWX Technologies to $65.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Tuesday. ValuEngine raised shares of BWX Technologies from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Monday, November 19th. Finally, Drexel Hamilton reissued a “buy” rating and set a $55.00 price objective on shares of BWX Technologies in a research note on Thursday, November 15th. Three analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, four have given a hold rating and three have given a buy rating to the company. The stock has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $58.63.

Get BWX Technologies alerts:

Shares of NYSE:BWXT opened at $52.35 on Friday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.93, a current ratio of 1.90 and a quick ratio of 1.90. The stock has a market capitalization of $5.24 billion, a P/E ratio of 25.54, a PEG ratio of 1.99 and a beta of 0.91. BWX Technologies has a 52 week low of $35.91 and a 52 week high of $72.18.

BWX Technologies (NYSE:BWXT) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Monday, February 25th. The technology company reported $0.74 EPS for the quarter, beating the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $0.59 by $0.15. The firm had revenue of $478.00 million during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $475.02 million. BWX Technologies had a net margin of 10.81% and a return on equity of 66.38%. The firm’s revenue was up 11.1% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter last year, the firm earned $0.47 earnings per share. On average, sell-side analysts anticipate that BWX Technologies will post 2.45 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

A number of hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently made changes to their positions in the stock. Shapiro Capital Management LLC boosted its holdings in shares of BWX Technologies by 171.1% in the 4th quarter. Shapiro Capital Management LLC now owns 3,962,354 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $151,481,000 after purchasing an additional 2,500,913 shares during the last quarter. Capital World Investors acquired a new position in shares of BWX Technologies in the 3rd quarter valued at $71,802,000. William Blair Investment Management LLC boosted its holdings in shares of BWX Technologies by 15.9% in the 3rd quarter. William Blair Investment Management LLC now owns 6,647,175 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $415,715,000 after purchasing an additional 911,880 shares during the last quarter. Brown Advisory Inc. boosted its holdings in shares of BWX Technologies by 14.5% in the 4th quarter. Brown Advisory Inc. now owns 5,811,393 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $222,170,000 after purchasing an additional 734,736 shares during the last quarter. Finally, FMR LLC boosted its holdings in shares of BWX Technologies by 77.1% in the 4th quarter. FMR LLC now owns 1,202,335 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $45,965,000 after purchasing an additional 523,473 shares during the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 93.43% of the company’s stock.

About BWX Technologies

BWX Technologies, Inc manufactures and sells nuclear components to the United States government. The company operates in three segments: Nuclear Operations, Technical Services, and Nuclear Energy. The Nuclear Operations segment offers precision naval nuclear components and reactors; close-tolerance and equipment for nuclear applications; and components for defense applications, as well as critical nuclear components, fuels, and assemblies for government and other uses.

Featured Story: Cash Flow Analysis in Stock Selection

The Fly

Analyst Recommendations for BWX Technologies (NYSE:BWXT)

Saturday, March 2, 2019

Nektar Therapeutics Inc (NKTR) Files 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended on December 31, 2018

Nektar Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ:NKTR) files its latest 10-K with SEC for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2018. Nektar Therapeutics Inc is a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of new molecules to treat diseases with unmet medical needs. The company is researching and developing drugs for treating cancer, auto-immune disease and chronic pain. Nektar Therapeutics Inc has a market cap of $6.6 billion; its shares were traded at around $38.13 with a P/E ratio of 9.64 and P/S ratio of 5.47. Nektar Therapeutics Inc had annual average EBITDA growth of 1.30% over the past ten years.

For the last quarter Nektar Therapeutics Inc reported a revenue of $39.8 million, compared with the revenue of $95.47 million during the same period a year ago. For the latest fiscal year the company reported a revenue of $1.2 billion, an increase of 287.8% from last year. For the last five years Nektar Therapeutics Inc had an average revenue growth rate of 38.3% a year.

The reported diluted earnings per share was $3.78 for the year, compared with the loss per share of $0.42 in the previous year. The Nektar Therapeutics Inc enjoyed an operating margin of 57.65%, compared with the operating margin of -14.19% a year before. The 10-year historical median operating margin of Nektar Therapeutics Inc is -74.45%. The profitability rank of the company is 7 (out of 10).

At the end of the fiscal year, Nektar Therapeutics Inc has the cash and cash equivalents of $194.9 million, compared with $4.76 million in the previous year. The long term debt was $247.0 million, compared with $245.2 million in the previous year. The interest coverage to the debt is at a comfortable level of 16.1. Nektar Therapeutics Inc has a financial strength rank of 8 (out of 10).

At the current stock price of $38.13, Nektar Therapeutics Inc is traded at 42.6% discount to its historical median P/S valuation band of $66.43. The P/S ratio of the stock is 5.47, while the historical median P/S ratio is 9.54. The stock lost 54.9% during the past 12 months.

CEO Recent Trades:

President & CEO Howard W Robin sold 108,882 shares of NKTR stock on 02/21/2019 at the average price of $42.19. The price of the stock has decreased by 9.62% since.

CFO Recent Trades:

SVP & CFO Gil M Labrucherie sold 3,592 shares of NKTR stock on 02/19/2019 at the average price of $42.39. The price of the stock has decreased by 10.05% since.

Directors and Officers Recent Trades:

SVP & Chief Accounting Officer Jillian B. Thomsen sold 1,808 shares of NKTR stock on 02/19/2019 at the average price of $42.39. The price of the stock has decreased by 10.05% since.SVP & COO John Nicholson sold 3,822 shares of NKTR stock on 02/19/2019 at the average price of $42.39. The price of the stock has decreased by 10.05% since.SVP Pharma Dev & Mfg Ops Maninder Hora sold 2,386 shares of NKTR stock on 02/19/2019 at the average price of $42.39. The price of the stock has decreased by 10.05% since.SVP & Chief Scientific Officer Stephen K Doberstein sold 3,310 shares of NKTR stock on 02/19/2019 at the average price of $42.39. The price of the stock has decreased by 10.05% since.SVP & Chief Accounting Officer Jillian B. Thomsen sold 16,119 shares of NKTR stock on 02/04/2019 at the average price of $42.16. The price of the stock has decreased by 9.56% since.

For the complete 20-year historical financial data of NKTR, click here.

Friday, March 1, 2019

Inogen Inc (INGN) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Inogen Inc  (NASDAQ:INGN)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 26, 2019, 4:30 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good afternoon and welcome to the Inogen 2018 Fourth Quarter Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. All participants will be in listen-only mode. (Operator Instructions) Please note, this event is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Matt Bacso, Investor Relations Manager. Please go ahead.

Matt Bacso -- Investor Relations Manager

Thank you for participating in today's call.

Joining me from Inogen is CEO, Scott Wilkinson and CFO and Co-Founder, Ali Bauerlein.

Earlier today, Inogen released financial results for the fourth quarter of 2018. This earnings release and Inogen's corporate presentation are currently available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website.

As a reminder, the information presented today will include forward-looking statements, including statements about our growth prospects and strategy for 2019 and beyond, market growth estimates and expectations, hiring expectations and the impact of recent hires on sales results, marketing expectations, international growth, product development and the upcoming launch of the Inogen One G5, expectations regarding the impact of Chinese tariffs in the finance -- in financial guidance for 2019. The forward-looking statements in this call are based on information currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve risks and uncertainties that are set forth in more detail in our most recent periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results may vary, and we disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law. We have posted historical financial statements and our third quarter investor presentation in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website. Please refer to these files for more detailed information.

During the call, we will also present certain financial information on a non-GAAP basis. Management believes that non-GAAP financial measures, taken in conjunction with the U.S. GAAP financial measures, provide useful information for both management and investors by excluding certain non-cash items and other expenses that are not indicative of Inogen's core operating results. Management uses non-GAAP measures internally to understand, manage and evaluate our business and make operating decisions. Reconciliations between U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP results are presented in tables within our earnings release.

For future periods, we are unable to provide a reconciliation of our non-GAAP guidance to the most directly comparable GAAP measures without unreasonable effort as discussed in more detail in our earnings release.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Inogen's President and CEO, Scott Wilkinson. Scott?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Matt. Good afternoon and thank you for joining our fourth quarter 2018 conference call.

Looking at the fourth quarter of 2018, we generated total revenue of $86.5 million, reflecting a robust 35.7% growth rate and solid results in all four revenue channels. Direct-to-consumer sales of $36.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 increased 50.4% over the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to increased sales representative headcount and associated consumer advertising.

Our direct-to-consumer sales team consisted of 446 inside sales reps as of December 31, 2018, which represented an increase of 183 reps, up approximately 70% over our 2017 year end total of 263.

Fourth quarter 2018 domestic business-to-business sales increased to $25.4 million. While business-to-business sales continued to grow, primarily due to strong demand by traditional home medical equipment providers and Internet resellers, order activity did slow from one national home care provider in the fourth quarter of 2018. Aside from this national home care provider, we saw strong demand across our diversified HME customer base. Specifically, when excluding this national home care provider, in the fourth quarter of 2018, domestic business-to-business sales increased at roughly the average rate of the previous four domestic business-to-business sales quarters.

As we have always said, it is important to remember that domestic business-to-business sales can be lumpy quarter-to-quarter due to the inherent challenges facing providers from both an infrastructure and financial perspective. Despite these natural barriers, we continue to believe the conversion to non-delivery technology is in process and will take at least five more years to fully realize.

Fourth quarter 2018 international business-to-business sales were very strong at $18.5 million. While we have acknowledge the fourth quarter was our easiest comp in 2018, we were very pleased to see robust European demand without the contribution of any meaningful tenders in the quarter. Fourth quarter 2018 rental revenue increased to $5.8 million, representing growth of 6.7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2017. In the face of declining net patients on service, this is the first revenue growth quarter for our direct rental business since the fourth quarter of 2015, when we began to shift our focus away from rentals and toward retail cash sales.

Transitioning to the subject of Chinese tariffs. In December 1st 2018, the U.S. and China agreed to postpone any increase in existing or new tariffs until March 1, 2019 as both sides work toward a more amicable trade deal. Specifically, the U.S. refrain from increasing its China import tax from 10% to 25% effective January 1st, 2019 on $200 billion of imported Chinese materials and products. President Trump decided on February 24th, 2019 to delay the increase from 10% to 25% effective March 1, 2019. However, no official trade deal has been reached and no timing was given for how long this additional delay will last.

Given the level of uncertainty around this global issue, our 2019 guidance continues to assume the full impact of these tariffs on applicable Chinese sourced materials. Included in guidance is an estimated $4 million increase to our cost of goods sold in 2019 for the revenue range listed. Going forward, we will continue to monitor any new tariff proposals and economic policy changes and take the necessary steps to protect our financial interests and mitigate our standard material cost risks.

Transitioning to product development, I briefly want to discuss our next generation portable oxygen concentrator, the Inogen One G5, which we still expect to launch in the first half of 2019. Similar to the Inogen One G4 launch, we expect to first roll out the G5 through our direct-to-consumer channel, followed by the domestic business-to-business channel and then the international business-to-business channel.

The Inogen One G5 will produce a higher flow rate of oxygen than the G3 with 1260 milliliters per minute of oxygen through six flow settings and will be smaller in size than the G3. We believe the G5 will have the highest oxygen output per pound of weight than any other portable oxygen concentrator currently available in the supplemental oxygen therapy U.S. homecare market, a distinction currently held by the Inogen One G4. We still expect the G5 to obsolete the G3 over the intermediate term. We anticipate the G5 will continue to keep us at the forefront of patient and provider preference in the portable oxygen concentrator market. With user evaluations complete, we are currently preparing for market launch.

Further, I would like to discuss Inogen Connect, our new connectivity platform for the Inogen One G4 and G5 devices. We launched Inogen Connect with the G4 through the direct-to-consumer channel in December 2018 followed by the domestic business-to-business channel for G4 and OxyGo FIT in February 2019. Inogen Connect is compatible with Apple and android platforms, and includes patient features such as oxygen purity status, battery run time, product support functions, notification alerts and remote software updates. We believe home oxygen providers will also find features such as remote troubleshooting, equipment health checks and a location tracker will drive operational efficiencies when transitioning away from the oxygen tank delivery model. Inogen Connect is planned to be included in the Inogen One G5 at launch in the United States.

As many of you know, recently there have been some questions from certain members of the investment community on the size and growth of the U.S. long-term oxygen therapy market and the business practices of some of our Internet resellers. Before Ali reviews our financial results, I wanted to address these issues head on. I'd like to comment on the 2015 WinterGreen report, which we had previously cited and felt was a reasonable source for long-term oxygen therapy market data and growth rates. Since the report was issued, a number of changes have occurred in the U.S. long-term oxygen therapy market as a result of competitive bidding, particularly after rates were applied nationally in 2016.

Given the age of the report, the market changes that have occurred following its publication and the recently released Medicare data from October, we have updated our view of the market based on more recent sources. While there is no updated single source of long-term oxygen therapy market data, we are now basing our current market estimates on data from CMS, the Kaiser Family Foundation, the U.S. Census, the Center for Disease Control and our own internal data. While this information requires us to make certain assumptions, which we believe are reasonable, we also believe it provides a more up to date view of the U.S. long-term oxygen therapy market. While Medicare beneficiary data showed a decline in 2017, when taking into account the shift to Medicare Advantage, private insurance, retail sales and the expanding (inaudible) we believe that overall patient growth was in the low single digits in 2017. And we expect that trend to continue for the next few years.

However, there are other major factors that are difficult to quantify, which we believe will help contribute to patient growth opportunities for POCs that exceed the overall long-term oxygen therapy market growth rate. First, reduced reimbursement rates as a result of competitive bidding, enhanced Medicare coverage and billing requirements, and other factors have created access issues and caused the cash pay market, which is not reflected in the Medicare data, to grow substantially for both new and existing patients.

Additionally, the industry is going through a major conversion from tank deliveries to POCs. We believe that the combination of these factors should lead the growth rates for POCs above the overall long-term oxygen therapy market growth rates over the next five plus years.

Lastly, we are an accredited home care provider license to provide respiratory products in all 50 states, heavily regulated by Medicare and the FDA and subject to frequent audits to maintain these accreditations and licenses and we take compliance with the law seriously. Specifically, we have compliance requirements in place for our authorized Internet resellers and without commenting on any specific Internet resellers, we accept that our Internet resellers abide by all applicable laws and regulations. We believe this is common practice in our industry as our Internet resellers also sell most competitive POCs on the market today, as well as other home care products.

It's also important to note that most Internet resellers are not accredited home care providers and are not enrolled as Medicare suppliers, meaning they cannot up and do not bill Medicare. We sell a variety of Internet resellers to a variety of Internet resellers, none of which are material customers and combined, they represent less than 15% of our total revenue in 2018.

I also want to point out that we received testimonials from our patients regularly, about how our products have changed their lives and allow them greater freedom and independence. While some patients would rather receive products using their insurance benefits, the reimbursement dynamics in oxygen therapy have led some patients to seek better options, even if it means paying out of pocket. We are proud that we and our customers can make a difference in these patients' lives.

Looking at 2019, we expect to remain a high growth company and to continue to make the appropriate investments in our sales force, advertising efforts and operations in order to drive portable oxygen concentrator adoption worldwide.

With that I will now turn the call over to our CFO, Ali Bauerlein.

Ali?

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Scott and good afternoon, everyone.

During my prepared remarks, I will review our fourth quarter of 2018 financial performance and then provide details on our updated 2019 guidance.

As Scott noted, total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2018 was $86.5 million, representing 35.7% growth over the fourth quarter of 2017.

Looking at each of our revenue streams, and turning first to our sales revenue, total sales revenue of $80.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 reflected 38.4% growth over the same quarter of the prior year. Total units sold increased to 46,100 in Q4 2018, up from 35.6% -- up 35.6% from 34,000 in Q4, 2017.

Direct-to-consumer sales for the fourth quarter of 2018 were $36.8 million, representing 50.4% growth over the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to increased sales representative headcount and increased advertising expenditures. We are proud of the growth we achieved in the fourth quarter of 2018, given the difficult comparable in the prior year where direct-to-consumer sales increased sequentially. As a reminder, this is normally not the case given the seasonality of our business.

Domestic business-to-business sales of $25.4 million in Q4 2018 reflected 16% growth over Q4 2017. When looking at customer mix, we saw strong demand from traditional HME providers and Internet resellers, but were negatively impacted by reduced orders from one national home care provider in the fourth quarter of 2018. Excluding this national home care provider in the fourth quarter of 2018, domestic business-to-business sales increased at roughly the average rate of the previous four domestic business-to-business sales quarters.

International business-to-business sales of $18.5 million in Q4 2018 increased 54.5% from Q4, 2017, and was driven mostly by strong European volume. While Q4 with our easiest growth comparable in 2018, demand continues to exceed our expectation despite the absence of any tender activity and the 2.5% headwind from foreign exchange rates.

Sales in Europe represented 87.8% of international sales in the fourth quarter of 2018, up from 84.3% in the fourth quarter of 2017. Sales revenue per unit sold increased over the same period in the prior year by 2%, primarily due to increased mix of direct-to-consumer sales, which have a higher average selling price.

Rental revenue represented 6.7% of total revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018 versus 8.5% in the fourth quarter of 2017. Rental revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018 was $5.8 million compared to $5.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, representing growth of 6.7% from the same period in the prior year, primarily due to higher revenue per patient on service due to the non-CBA rate increase that went into effect June of 2018 and lower rental revenue adjustments. This increase was partially offset by a 12.4% decline in net rental patients on service.

Turning to gross margin. For the fourth quarter of 2018, total gross margin was 50.4% compared to 48.2% in the fourth quarter of 2017. Our sales gross margin was 51.4% in the fourth quarter of 2018 versus 50.5% in the fourth quarter of 2017. The sales gross margin increase was primarily due to a favorable mix shift toward higher gross margin direct-to-consumer sales versus business-to-business sales.

The favorable mix was partially offset by lower average selling prices in both the domestic and international business-to-business channels in exchange for increased volume, and lower direct-to0consumer pricing effective June 1st, 2018.

Average cost of goods sold per unit also increased (inaudible) in the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to the fourth quarter of 2017 due to increased direct-to-consumer where consumers tend to buy configurations with additional accessories.

Rental gross margin, was 36.2% in the fourth quarter of 2018 versus 23.2% in the fourth quarter of 2017. The increase in rental gross margin was primarily due to increased rental revenue per patient on service, and lower depreciation expense.

As for operating expense, total operating expense increased to $38.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2018, or 44.8% of revenue versus $25.6 million or 40.1% of revenue in the fourth quarter of 2017, as we invested in sales personnel, infrastructure and related advertising to support planned growth.

Research and development expense increased to $1.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to $1.4 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to the increased personnel related expenses and product development expenses.

Sales and marketing expense increased to $28.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 versus $15.2 million in the comparative period in 2017, primarily due to increased personnel related expenses as we continue to hire inside sales representatives at our Cleveland facility and increased advertising expenditures. In terms of sales rep addition cadence, we hired the most new reps in the third quarter of 2018, which increased expenses for these reps in the fourth quarter of 2018, when these reps were not at full productivity. But we believe this is expected to contribute to strong sales in 2019 as these reps reach their productivity target.

In the first quarter of 2018, we spent $10.8 million in advertising as compared to $4.4 million in Q4, 2017. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we did have higher media related expenses due to inefficiencies created by the large increase in sales reps as well as the mid-term election cycle and health insurance plans open enrollment.

General and administrative expense decreased to $8.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 versus $9 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to a $0.5 million reduction in patent defense cost and $0.4 million reduction in bad debt expense, which was partially offset by increased personnel related expenses.

Operating income for the fourth quarter of 2018 was $4.8 million, which represented a 5.5% return on revenue. Operating income declined 8% in the fourth quarter of 2018 versus the fourth quarter of 2017, where operating income was $5.2 million or an 8.1% return on revenue. The reduction in fourth quarter 2018 operating margin compared to fourth quarter of 2017 was primarily due to significant investments in sales personnel, infrastructure and related advertising.

In the fourth quarter of 2018, we reported an income tax benefit of $4.2 million compared to a $6.4 million income tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2017, which included a $7.6 million non-cash income tax provision expense associated with the revaluation of our deferred tax asset. Our income tax benefit in the fourth quarter of 2018 included a $6 million decrease in provision for income taxes related to excess tax benefits recognized from stock-based compensation compared to a $3.5 million decrease in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Excluding both the deferred tax asset revaluation expense and the stock-based compensation benefit, our non-GAAP effective tax rate in the fourth quarter of 2018 was 30.6% versus 40% in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to the impact of the U.S. federal tax reform.

In the fourth quarter of 2018, we reported GAAP net income of $10 million compared to a GAAP net loss of $600,000 in the fourth quarter of 2017. Earnings per diluted common share was $0.44 in the fourth quarter of 2018 versus net loss per diluted common share of $0.03 in the fourth quarter of 2017. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $240.3 million, an increase of $16.5 million compared to $223.9 million as of September 30th 2018.

Now turning to guidance. We are reiterating our full year 2019 total revenue guidance range of $430 million to $440 million, representing growth of 20.1% to 22.9% versus 2018 full year results. We still expect direct-to-consumer sales to be our fastest growing channel and domestic business-to-business sales and international business-to-business sales to have a solid growth rate. While we continue to see strong demand from traditional HME providers, given reduced order activities from one large provider, we expect domestic business-to-business sales to grow modestly in the first half of 2019 with growth improving in the back half of 2019, as our revenue period-over-period comps get easier. Internationally, we still expect we will be primarily focused on the European markets in 2019.

Lastly, we continue to expect rental revenue to grow modestly in 2019 compared to 2018 in spite of the additional 3.9% cut to portable oxygen concentrator Medicare reimbursement rates effective January 1st 2019 and the change in accounting associated with the new lease standards that require rental bad debt expense to be a rental revenue adjustment instead of a general and administrative expense.

We are reducing our full year 2019 GAAP net income guidance range to $40 million to $44 million, down from $48 million to $52 million compared to 2018 GAAP net income of $51.8 million. This decrease in net income is due to a decrease in estimated provision for income taxes related to excess tax benefits recognized from stock-based compensation, from $12 million to $4 million due to our current stock price and fewer expected option exercises in 2019.

When excluding the benefit from the estimated $4 million decrease in provision for income taxes expected in 2019 from stock-based compensation actions, we expect a non-GAAP effective tax rate of approximately 24% in 2019.

We are reiterating our full year 2019 operating income guidance range of $46 million to $50 million, representing growth of 21.4% to 32% versus 2018 full year results. We are also reiterating our full year 2019 adjusted EBITDA guidance range of $67 million to $71 million, representing growth of 9.3% to 15.9% versus 2018 full year results.

We still expect net positive cash flow in 2019 with no additional capital required to meet our current operating plan.

With that, Scott and I will be happy to take your questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions)

Our first question comes from Robbie Marcus with JP Morgan. Please go ahead.

Robert Justin Marcus -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Hi, and thanks for taking my question. Maybe you could spend a minute on the the composition of sales in the quarter with B2C doing so well and U.S. B2B slowing down a little bit for the second quarter, maybe speak to some of the underlying trends you're seeing in the business in terms of distributors willing to purchase POCs and is this actually a benefit for for you here as you get the benefit of picking up more of the direct-to-consumer sales?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Robbie, it's Scott. I'll take that one. I'll start with the B2B channel. We mentioned that there is a major customer that they slowed down their purchases. But if you'll note, we also mentioned that the rest of the HME customers are continuing to buy at a rate that's consistent with the previous four quarters that we've seen in that channel. So we've got a nice diversified customer base, the rest of them continue to purchase at a nice growth rate.

And we wanted to highlight that because while a large customer, when they slow down the purchases, it's hard to ignore in the total growth rate, we wanted to give some color and understanding on what's going on in the market. So that's part one and we continue to expect that the market will convert to POCs over the next five years as we said.

If you look at how things will shape up though, the customer -- the large customer that slowed their purchases, they bought at a much heavier rate in the fourth quarter of '17 and the first half of '18 and then they started to slow down really, in the end of the third quarter and in the fourth quarter, last year and we don't know when that they might pickup.

Now, I tend to not like to talk about any specific customer individually, we always try to tell our story instead of somebody else's story. So let me kind of frame some of the struggles that happened out there in the market at more of a macro level. You'll note that we've always said the purchases by the HME community are lumpy and people always want to know why, why do you think they're lumpy, why is your guidance in that channel generally a little more conservative? Well it's because there's restructure challenges that these HME folks are facing that are very difficult. If you look at the spectrum of providers, the smaller providers, they tend to have more issues with cash flow and access to capital. And so for them, just the money to buy POCs versus buying tanks is a struggle for them.

If you go to the other end of the spectrum, to the larger players, and specifically a large national home care provider, they tend to have access to capital but their restructure exercise is much more daunting. They've built successful businesses by having large, efficient delivery infrastructure that gives them economies of scale and efficiencies and no matter those economies of scale, we've always said that if you don't restructure and tear out those cost out of your business, then you won't reap the benefits of the non-delivery model.

So it will be a struggle and we think we'll continue to see starts and stops here and there for various reasons. We'll continue to say that sales and the purchase patterns can be lumpy, but it doesn't change our long-term view of the market that we'll go through a conversion, it's going to take some time, that's what we've always said, this isn't an overnight or a one-year process as well. It's a many year process and we think it's at least five years from this point.

Now if you look at the overall -- overriding factor in the market is that patients prefer POCs over tank, OK? And that's -- I mean, that's really what's driven our business and nothing has changed there and they don't prefer POCs any less when somebody is facing a restructure issue or a cash flow issue and that creates a great opportunity for us. POCs are definitely preferred and if you look at any data set that you can find, there's a lot more people driving around tanks than using on POCs today. So we think those -- the long-term opportunity for us to continue to grow is very solid.

Now if you -- I guess let's take that over to our direct-to-consumer side. I mean, we've invested heavily last year in building that sales capacity. 10 years ago, we developed this model so that we wouldn't lose access to the market when things like this happen. We really enjoyed working with the provider partners, we think we're a great resource and we have common goals on helping patients, but we have put ourselves in a position that we have access to market and access to patients, whether they face those issues or not. And we're pretty pleased that the position that we're in and that wasn't by accident. So I think the investments that we made last year should continue to pay off for us. It should continue to drive high growth this year. As Alis said in her comments, we expect that direct-to-consumer will continue to be our fastest growing channel and then Europe is kind of set aside from the USA. It's a different animal with different reimbursement.

Nevertheless, it's B2B and it's different reimbursement in every market, we're farther away from the customers there. So what we're really excited about the growth that we saw in 2018, we will continue to be a little more conservative on our guidance there. But long term, patients for prefer a POCs compared to tanks in Europe, just like they do here, it doesn't change. So again, I think we're in a good spot to continue to grow, because we have -- we are not only working in a product preferred area in POCs, but don't forget, we also have the product that's the most preferred by the patients, the end user, as well.

Robert Justin Marcus -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

That's it for me. I'll leave. That was a great answer. I'll leave it there. Thanks a lot, guys.

Operator

The next question is from JP McKim with Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead.

JP McKim -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Hi, thanks for taking the question. Scott, I just wanted to ask a question on kind of your investment because this is the second quarter of heavy investments and so, from our view, we look at margins and then we say they've been going down, so maybe these investments aren't worth today, but you've got better internal metrics that you look at. So, is there a way that you could frame up to us that these investments that you're hiring reps and spending on advertising are paying off maybe more kind of lead indicators you can provide for us?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, I'll start and if Ali has something to add, I'll let her chime in. But remember, the underlying issue here, I should say, opportunity is that, and I said it earlier, there is a lot more patients dragging around tanks than carrying POCs. Now, if you go back to the most recent data that we have, the Medicare data where we look at the measure of POC penetration, it's still pretty modest and that comes out to 11%, now the data as 2017 and we've been pretty candid to say that that doesn't capture patients on the retail side. And the retail side is much more significant now due to the access issues and the spend, but even if you added a fair amount of basis points to that, or even more conservative and say we doubled it, 20%, 20% penetration is still quite a ways from full penetration in the market.

So, we feel very comfortable investing in sales capacity, looking at the long term and you're absolutely right, I mean we made some conscious decisions that we were going to make some investments in 2018, we were going to focus a little less than we have on the past on our bottom line. We certainly didn't plan to go into a loss, but we said will titrate and if we could actually hold our net income even or better than we would be satisfied for that and the trade-off would be a higher growth rate. And if you look at our growth rates, we accelerated pretty significantly in 2018 versus the previous years and that's even on a higher base.

We think, looking at the long term, that's the right investment to make and we're absolutely long on ourselves. So while obviously as a public company, you've got to manage quarter-to-quarter, we do put an emphasis on the long term and the right strategic moves to keep us in a winning position.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and just to add on to that, I mean I would say, we did consciously make an effort in 2018 to accelerate that growth rate and we are proud of that result, as Scott said, we went from 2017, our revenue grew 23% and in 2018, it grew 43.6%. So a substantial acceleration in our revenue growth rate and that cost us about 50 basis points of operating margin. So while, it did, that we are showing less leverage than we saw in previous periods, we do think that that was a worthwhile investment.

Now when you look at the specific quarters, obviously, there was more leverage in the first half of the year than there is in the back half of 2018. And there were some inefficiencies, as we did scale this business so quickly and there were some learnings there, as we increased the advertising spend, we didn't see as much efficiencies there, as we had hoped and we really are focused on that now, as a key area that we're looking at in 2019 to improve our overall results, so to look at getting those reps fully up to speed and also making sure we have effective and efficient media sources for the lead sources that we need.

So that is a focus, obviously part of guidance is to improve operating margin versus our 2018 results and we as a management team are certainly focused on that and we certainly had some headwinds in Q4 that we don't plan to repeat in 2019.

JP McKim -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Okay, that's very helpful. Just a couple of ones more from me here is just, can you comment quickly on the G5 COGS compared to G4 or G3, if you can do that? And then, how do you give investors confidence that this large HME is just pausing purchases and they're not just buying from another competitor?

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, sure. So I'll take the first one. On the COGS side, we haven't put out an official COGS reduction or anything related to the G5 versus the G3 or the G4. Historically, we have been able to reduce COGS as we've launched new products and be able to take in lower part counts, design efficiencies, higher volume, all of that does lead to lower cost over time. So that would be our plan for the G5 as well. There's always some inefficiencies right out of the gate, as you're ramping up manufacturing and you're working through the processes that we would expect that to occur with the G5 as well. So at volume, at scale, we do expect the G5 to be a lower cost profile for us and to help improve margins over time, but we haven't quantified the exact impact and obviously we haven't yet launched the product to the market. So, we would be pretty cautious in doing that until we're kind of through that initial manufacturing build and plan.

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, and let me take the second part on the large customer that you talked about on buying patterns and who they're buying from. While they've slowed very significantly, we do still see orders from them, so they certainly have not ceased ordering from us and they advised that they were going to slow down. So, that wasn't a huge surprise, once that was communicated to us. Now, you have to remember that, most of the larger guys out there, whether it's nationals and even some of the larger medium players, they'll generally dual or even tri-source to mitigate risk, just like we do that with our suppliers.

So were they buying units from somebody else? Well, probably, they -- most people always do when they have that kind of size, just like we do. But that's why it's so important that we continue to invest in product development that we continue to improve our product, stay ahead of the competition, so that we remain the preferred product. That's the best way to be the preferred supplier with any customer out there is to drive that patient preference and give them great value, great preference at a reasonable price.

JP McKim -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Got it. Thank you so much.

Operator

The next question comes from Margaret Kaczor with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Margaret Kaczor -- William Blair -- Analyst

Hey, good afternoon guys. Thanks for taking the questions. So first off for me, you guys addressed market growth commentary on the front end, but just wanted to follow up on the market dynamics, so I'm warning it's a four-part question. So, part A, can you guys address how you're monitoring the market dynamics within HME on penetration? Part B is, what kind of customer targeting efforts are you and/or your private label partner making? What kind of investments are you putting in the field? And then I guess the third part is how is this year different from what you're saying, either strategically going out throughout this year relative to the prior year, two, is it easier and more difficult and any examples you can provide?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So I'll take that one, Margaret, it's Scott. Thanks for your question. As far as the penetration rate, the best data available is still that Medicare data and unfortunately, there is nothing else that we've seen that's cleaner data. So that's our index that we get once a year. Now, we watch all of our other advertising and close rate metrics as part of our D2C channel as leading indicators on what's going on. You look at buying patterns from customers, I mean, certainly, the customers that we sell directly to, we service monitor, look at what they're buying so they grow year-over-year, for some reason any given customer is not, you go find out why, you always want to find out if somebody's even or down in a growing market and POCs are certainly a growing market, are they having an issue or have you lost a customer? And you've got to find that out and you have to address it. I mean, we've at times, you know everybody occasionally lose with the customer, so it's not that we've never lost a customer in our lives, but if you want to understand if you did why and what you have to do to get them back. So that's what our direct HME team is doing. Now, that's a pretty small and modest team and we've been pretty conservative as far as making investments there. Our investment has been in our primary go-to-market strategy of direct-to-consumer and we've got this great partnership with our private label partner, they've got more field reps out there that can call on HMEs than we do. And we think they've done a super job.

So we've kind of handed that off to them to drive that and we've been more of a support vehicle to them. What do you need for help? What is pricing look like? You have to make sure that they are able to offer a competitive price. You can put them in a position where they can't make any money and they price themselves out of the market. So that's where our efforts go is making sure that they have the support from us that we've got the support to the direct players that we've kind of got our finger on the pulse of the market and understand what's going on. So far, we're pleased with the conversion. Like I said, outside of albeit a large customer finding it necessary to slow down the numbers that we see in the market and all of our metrics are very positive for growth.

Margaret Kaczor -- William Blair -- Analyst

Okay. And then just I guess part C of that question was, as you look at this year or the future years relative to the prior years two, is it better or is it worse? And then if I'm calculating it correctly, excluding sales into this one larger provider, was that growth in B2B domestic almost 50%?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Correct. I'll just take the last part of that first. So yes, if you just look at the domestic B2B for the prior four quarters, it was approximately 50% was the growth rate for those prior periods.

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I mean, Margaret, it'll, as I said, it'll -- until there is a return to normalcy, it creates a tougher comp in the B2B channel, at least in the first half of the year until we catch up with they've slowed down. So we recognize that.

As far as the other part of your question is more challenges this year versus last year. I think there are some inherent challenges as you go down this path to convert your business as a home care provider. When you start out, there's always some low hanging fruit that every provider can pick. They can put some POCs on either some highly ambulatory patients that shoot through a lot of tanks and they actually see some benefit without really reducing any significant infrastructure or they can put some POCs on more remote patients that are a higher cost of delivery and they see some fast results there. But you don't see that forever, eventually, you have to hunker down into the tough task of sorting out your infrastructure and as people have been buying at a fairly brisk rate over the last couple of years, that will be more of a challenge for them that they've got to -- for them to really realize benefit, they've got to get those cost out that are associated with delivery.

Now, as I've said in the past, I think once you get past that halfway point, once you get through, you've got more patients that are on a POC than on tanks that makes it a little bit easier, it's literally your kind of climate up one side of the hill and once you get past the halfway point, I think it gets a little bit easier. But we're certainly not on the back side of the hill yet.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and just to add on to that, we still feel very confident in our guidance for this year at a range of $430 million to $440 million. When we put that guidance in place in November, we had already seen from some volatility with this large national provider, which is why when we initially put out the guidance for 2019 that we said we expected solid business-to-business growth domestically and that we did know already the comps were going to be tough for us in Q1 and Q2 2019, just associated with the buying patterns in 2018.

So all of that was factored into guidance. And that's why we are conservative when we look at at B2B guidance both domestically and internationally is because we aren't in control and we know that this industry has significant challenges to convert their businesses and that there will be (inaudible) and stops and lumpiness in how this develops over time.

So that was factored into guidance and obviously we've made a significant investment in our sales force, direct-to-consumer sales force in 2018 and that's why we expect that to be our fastest growing channel going into 2019.

Margaret Kaczor -- William Blair -- Analyst

Great. Thank you, guys.

Operator

The next question comes from Danielle Antalffy with SVP Leerink. Please go ahead.

Danielle Antalffy -- Leerink -- Analyst

Hey, good afternoon, guys. Thanks so much for taking the question. Just one question on the market commentary, Scott. So I think what you're seeing now is the oxygen therapy market based on more recent data you think is more low single-digits, POC should grow faster than that. Do you have any update specifically on the TAM? I think in the past you guys have said total of 2.5 million to 3 million oxygen therapy patients, I mean, is that number still an accurate number given the way -- the new way you guys are looking at the data?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, it's a good question, Danielle, and there is no change to our TAM estimate of 2.5 million to 3 million patients. So yeah, we've looked at it a few different ways, we keep landed in that same area. I will emphasize that we've always said 2.5 million to 3 million, we haven't said 3.0 million or anything, it's kind of an acknowledgment that it's an estimate, it's probably a tougher estimate now than it used to be because of the movement within the data sources. But I think the key is, it's not 20 million, it's not 500,000, we feel very good about that estimate, no change to that.

Danielle Antalffy -- Leerink -- Analyst

Yes. Okay. That's perfect. Thank you so much for that. And then one follow-up question on the home care provider that you saw back off on purchasing recently. Is this something that you expect to, and sorry if I missed this earlier, but you expect this home care provider to start purchasing again or is this potentially a customer that's lost? And how in touch with that customer are you today during this time where they're not actually a purchaser? Just trying to get a sense if this is some -- if we could see this this customer come back?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, it's a good question.

Danielle Antalffy -- Leerink -- Analyst

And how much (multiple speakers) you have behind that?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, and I think -- and again, I try as much as possible to not talk about somebody else's business plan or what they're going to do individually. So let me say it like this. I don't know when they'll come back. They've got some things that they would have to sort out in order for, I think, the pace to pick up where it used to be. I go back to remember patients want POCs and so if they can't get it through that provider, they can get it through other providers and they can get it through Inogen, that's again I'm happy we put ourselves in that position 10 years ago, so that we're not blocked from access to the market when the home care provider channel or a big customer like that have some things that they have to tackle. So we just can't predict when, so I don't want to make a prediction that we just don't have clarity on.

Danielle Antalffy -- Leerink -- Analyst

Yeah.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and just to reiterate, that customer is still buying but in reduced quantities compared to the prior run rate.

Danielle Antalffy -- Leerink -- Analyst

Okay, got it. Thank you so much, guys.

Operator

The next question comes from Mike Matson with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

Mike Matson -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. Just wanted to start with the -- some of the market commentary that you made. I know you just gave Danielle kind of the repeated numbers, but I think I heard one other change in what you're saying. So it sounds like you're now talking about the market kind of being fully penetrated inside of a five-year time frame versus the seven years to 10 years that you used to talk about. Did I hear that correctly? And I guess why do you now think it's five years?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I mean we -- it's a good question, Mike. We've been saying, seven years to 10 years, but we realize we've been say the seven years to 10 years for a couple of years, and we've also said we're already in process of that conversion. So we realize that if we continue to say seven years to 10 years, we're kind of just pushing that out, right? So that's why we now said more than five years. So I still don't -- I don't think it's going to happen overnight, again, I'll say it's an estimate, we are seeing some of the challenges that people have. Could it take longer? Yeah, it could take it could take longer. Could it go faster? Yeah, it could. For us again, that's why it's so important that we have access to the market ourselves so that we have more control of our own destiny.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Right. And remember, if it does take longer than five years, say, it does take 10 years from now, that would mean that the cash, the retail opportunity would be stronger for a much longer period of time. So we see that still as an opportunity for us to be able to continue to capture market share and as B2B accelerate, then obviously the B2B sales would be well above our 2019 guidance in whatever period that acceleration happened versus expectations.

Mike Matson -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Okay, that's helpful, thanks. And then just with regard to the first half of '19, I understand you don't give quarterly guidance, but I'm coming up against some really tough comps in the first half. So I know you've guided to revenue growth range, I haven't calculated exactly where consensus is, but are you comfortable in that with where the street was modeling things for the first and second quarters of '19, is there any kind of qualitative guidance you'd like to give us around do you expect to be -- I'd imagine you're going to be growing slower in the first half than in the second half, but?

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. So thanks for the question. And we don't give quarterly guidance, as you know. But we did make the comment around the particularly tough comps in Q1 and Q2 for a reason. So we do think that those growth rates will be challenging in the first half of the year, assuming that the large national provider doesn't go back to the cadence that they were buying previously, but we do feel good about still maintaining a solid growth rate in the domestic B2B channel for the full year that it already taken into account some level of volatility within the quarters, but yes, Q1 and Q2 will be more challenging than Q3 and Q4 in the domestic B2B channel from a comp perspective.

Mike Matson -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Okay, thanks. And then just finally, can you comment at all on the uptake or adoption, I guess of Inogen Connect? I mean, I know it's on the products that you're selling now, but how much of (inaudible) and then second point I guess would be just on Inogen Capital. That's sort of kind of (inaudible) last quarter was, you know, you've rolled out or talked about rolling out Inogen Capital. So maybe where things stand with that and what kind of reception have you seen? Thanks.

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Inogen Connect, I'll take that one and I'll turn the Inogen Capital question over to Ali. We launched, as we said in the patient channel late fourth quarter, we've seen a ton of patients hook up. It's really kind of exciting because of that geo tracker we can, we can look at all the product on the map, you actually -- even though we've only sold devices in the USA. you can see where people are taken trips and product shows up in Europe and other places on the globe.

We've probably got a little bit heavier connect rate out of the gate than we expected and it's been a little easier for people to hook up, we beefed up a little bit on the support side, realized that the seniors tend to struggle with this is Bluetooth connection things, that's going pretty well. No, it's not for everybody. There's some people have no interest. Some people say maybe later, but it's pretty exciting those that really value it and to see that are moving about in that retail channel. It excites the team and the, I'll say, it really excites our engineers that they can see those patients moving around.

On the B2B side, we just launched this month. So we're a couple of weeks in, pretty early. Most of the B2B customers are just getting their provider portals setup, so that they can monitor the data through their portals. So it's a little early to comment because like I said, we're only two weeks in, but we can have some more commentary on the next call. Capital?

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, so on Inogen Capital, obviously, we're excited to roll that out in the fourth quarter, we have had customers use that. Remember, this is really targeting the small HME providers. So this is really not meant to be a financing source for the regional or large players as most have access to financing through their own banking relationship. So it's really meant to help those small HME providers and we expect that to continue to grow in 2019 as more providers get comfortable with the product offering.

Mike Matson -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Great. Thank you.

Operator

Your next question comes from Matthew Blackman with Stifel. Please go ahead.

Matthew Blackman -- Stifel -- Analyst

Good afternoon, everyone. If I could start with a couple more questions on the provider that decreased ordering activity. First, would you be willing to share what percent of your business that customer represents? And then second, just want to be clear, the second half acceleration you expect in domestic B2B, that's purely comp driven right, your guidance doesn't contemplate that provider accelerates ordering in the back half.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Correct, yes. So -- So let me take the first question. So that customer was not a material customer, that customer actually purchasing through our private-label partner who is the material customer. So just to make that clear. But our guidance does not assume that that customer accelerate growth in the back half, and that that's contributing to the overall guidance number.

Matthew Blackman -- Stifel -- Analyst

Okay. Then, and then if I could shift to cash deployment. And this is for Ali or Scott, I assume M&A is still the highest priority and any updates on business development activities would be helpful. But also, just given the volatility in the stock, I'm curious if you're now more actively considering other ways of putting the balance sheet to work?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, let me talk about the M&A piece first. You know, we continue to look for the right product to add. But we're certainly not at a point where we just want to add something to add it. So that bar continues to be high. We'd like something obviously that's disruptive. We don't want to just add a me-too product that we sell on price, that's really a waste of this fantastic asset that we have in our direct-to-consumer sales force and our marketing team. So we continue to look, obviously, haven't found anything yet. We haven't closed anything. If we were to get to a point where we feel like we're over that back side of a mountain that I described with Margaret, and we haven't found anything yet, then we probably relax our criteria, but right now, we're really looking for something that would be disruptive, big market, leverage all of our expertise and haven't found it yet.

And the second part of the question?

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I'll take that. So on other capital allocation strategies, currently all options are certainly items that we could pursue in the future. Nothing has been decided at this point that would be appropriate given that we still have a large opportunity on the acquisition front. And we expect to use cash at some point in time for that. So no change in capital allocation strategy at this point.

Matthew Blackman -- Stifel -- Analyst

Okay. And if I could sneak in one last one for you, Ali. Just given the large increase in the sales force denominator, is there a way you can give us a a tenured rep productivity rate in 2018 and maybe how that compared to 2017, anything precise or even directional would be helpful.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, we really don't disclose that for competitive purposes, particularly as more of our manufacturing competitors have now jumped into the direct-to-consumer space, we like to keep that information very tightly held in the organization.

Matthew Blackman -- Stifel -- Analyst

But I think in the past you said that sort of on a year-to-year basis, it's sort of a low single-digit increase. I'm just wondering if that's still accurate.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, that is still accurate. So we do expect to continue to improve productivity each year. So each year we have initiatives on the productivity side to improve that. And usually that's a couple of percentage points. Sometimes, the things that jump productivity are things like new product launches, that type of thing, but nothing like that is assumed in guidance.

Matthew Blackman -- Stifel -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks very much.

Operator

The next question comes through -- from Matthew Mishan with KeyBanc. Please go ahead.

Matthew Mishan -- keybanc -- Analyst

Great, thank you for taking the questions. And just a follow-up on the M&A piece of it. Are you guys seeing that that type of products in the pipeline that you think could be a good fit for Inogen to leverage the direct-to-consumer channel or -- but not necessarily at the right price right now? And just curious, what do you think really would be the kind of criteria of a product that would leverage your D2C sales force?

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I think it's fair to say we really haven't found the right product, one that is truly disruptive because if you believe you have the right product, and of course there is a reasonable limit, but price is not that important if you think you have the right product, that's going to keep you on a high growth path for many years in the future. So, I suppose, somebody could price themselves out of the market. But the main thing is that we haven't found the right thing that we think is disruptive, that really fits what we want to do from a market standpoint.

We've seen some things that I'll say they caught our eye. It's not that we don't have anything that we don't -- we've got some things we have our eye on, but they haven't been compelling enough for us to jump. It's -- I think it's fair to say that if we were a few years out in the future, some of these things that we've said maybe that checks five of our six boxes that we want, we might be willing to take that if we didn't find something compelling in the next couple of years. But right now, I will say, we're very picky right now.

Matthew Mishan -- keybanc -- Analyst

Okay.

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. And I would say also there -- of the ideas that we're watching, it is important for that clinical efficacy and making sure that it's something that really will make a difference to patients and treat their needs. So that's something we're -- in evaluating all ideas, really taking at the forefront.

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

We have seen some pretty cool things though, Matt, I'll say that they didn't -- they were great products, but didn't leverage our direct-to-consumer approach. So that's where it wasn't a good match.

Matthew Mishan -- keybanc -- Analyst

Okay. And then the last question, could you give us a sense of what the underlying growth for sales and marketing is in 2019 that's implied by your guidance? I'm just trying to understand the leverage to the direct-to-consumer next year and how we should think about the phasing of the growth of sales and marketing for 2019?

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, so obviously, we don't give specific guidance on the sales and marketing line just at a qualitative basis, so we do expect to see some leverage, the best leverage should happen in Q2 and Q3, just given when we see our normal sales seasonality and then lower in Q4 and Q1. So I would expect that trend to repeat in 2019 as it has in most years, all else being equal. So I do think that that's important to note, but we do expect to see some efficiency compared to where we were in 2018, because remember, the rate of sales force expansion in 2019 should be lower than that rate for the last couple of years.

Matthew Mishan -- keybanc -- Analyst

All right. Thanks, Scott, Ali. Bye.

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Scott Wilkinson for any closing remarks.

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks. I wanted to close by saying 2018 was a year of investment for Inogen, as we continued to scale our sales infrastructure associated with our direct-to-consumer commercial strategy. These investments helped us deliver record revenue and bottom line results in 2018 and helped position Inogen for what we believe will be another year of strong revenue growth in 2019. We are executing on our strategic initiatives and remain focused on increasing adoption of our best-in-class portable oxygen concentrators. I would likely last to thank our employees for another fantastic year. Thank you and good evening.

Operator

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Duration: 62 minutes

Call participants:

Matt Bacso -- Investor Relations Manager

Scott Wilkinson -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Alison Bauerlein -- Chief Financial Officer

Robert Justin Marcus -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

JP McKim -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Margaret Kaczor -- William Blair -- Analyst

Danielle Antalffy -- Leerink -- Analyst

Mike Matson -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Matthew Blackman -- Stifel -- Analyst

Matthew Mishan -- keybanc -- Analyst

More INGN analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.